Bailey et al v. Gatan, Inc. et al
Filing
124
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 8/12/16 GRANTING Defendants' Request to Seal portions of Joint Statement regarding Discovery dispute and related documents 122 . (Mena-Sanchez, L)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
CHARLES J. STEVENS, SBN 106981
cstevens@gibsondunn.com
MATTHEW S. KAHN, SBN 261679
mkahn@gibsondunn.com
DEENA B. KLABER, SBN 285237
dklaber@gibsondunn.com
GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP
555 Mission Street, Suite 3000
San Francisco, CA 94105-0921
Telephone: 415.393.8200
Facsimile: 415.393.8306
Attorneys for GATAN, INC., and ROPER
TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
SACRAMENTO DIVISION
11
12
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, and
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ex rel. BRENT
BAILEY and EMILY WADE,
13
Plaintiffs,
14
v.
15
16
CASE NO. 2:12-CV-0106 MCE CKD
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS
GATAN, INC. AND ROPER
TECHNOLOGIES, INC.’S REQUEST TO
SEAL PORTIONS OF JOINT STATEMENT
REGARDING DISCOVERY DISPUTE AND
RELATED DOCUMENTS
GATAN, INC., and ROPER INDUSTRIES,
INC.,
Defendants.
17
18
19
Having considered Defendants Gatan, Inc. and Roper Technologies, Inc.’s (“Defendants”)
20
Request to Seal Portions of Joint Statement Regarding Discovery Dispute and Related Documents
21
submitted on August 10, 2016, and the papers submitted in relation thereto, and finding good cause
22
therefor:
23
Defendants’ Request to Seal Portions of Joint Statement Regarding Discovery Dispute and
24
Related Documents submitted to the Court on August 10, 2016 is GRANTED. Defendants shall file
25
the redacted version of the Joint Statement and related documents within ten (10) days of this Order.
26
Dated: August 12, 2016
27
28
Gibson, Dunn &
Crutcher LLP
_____________________________________
CAROLYN K. DELANEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
1
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ REQ. TO
SEAL – 2:12-CV-0106 MCE CKD
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?