Bailey et al v. Gatan, Inc. et al

Filing 23

ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 5/10/13 ORDERING that Plaintiff and Relator Richard Roe's MOTION for Voluntary withdraw as a party to this case is GRANTED and Richard Roe is withdrawn and DISMISSED as a party to this case.(Mena-Sanchez, L)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 13 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, and STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ex rel. BRENT BAILEY, EMILY WADE, and RICHARD ROE, Plaintiffs, 14 15 16 17 18 No. 2:12-cv-00106-MCE-CKD ORDER v. GATAN, INC., ROPER INDUSTRIES, INC. and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive, Defendants. 19 20 Relator and Plaintiff Richard Roe voluntarily moved for an order dismissing 21 himself as a Relator and Plaintiff in this case. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a) 22 provides that voluntary dismissal is permitted “before the opposing party serves either an 23 answer or a motion for summary judgment.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a). Here, no opposing 24 party has filed an answer or a motion for summary judgment, and counsel for Plaintiff 25 Richard Roe has declared that the United States, the State of California, and the two 26 remaining Plaintiffs and Relators consent to the withdrawal and dismissal of Plaintiff and 27 Relator Richard Roe. Withdrawal and dismissal of Plaintiff Richard Roe does not 28 constitute dismissal, withdrawal, or release of claims made on behalf of the real parties 1 1 in interest, the United States, and the State of California, or made on behalf of the two 2 remaining Plaintiffs and Relators. 3 Accordingly, Plaintiff and Relator Richard Roe’s motion to voluntarily withdraw as 4 a party to this case is GRANTED (ECF No. 18) and Richard Roe is withdrawn and 5 dismissed as a party to this case. 6 IT IS SO ORDERED. 7 DATE: May 10, 2013 8 9 10 ___________________________________________ MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR., CHIEF JUDGE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?