Bailey et al v. Gatan, Inc. et al
Filing
23
ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 5/10/13 ORDERING that Plaintiff and Relator Richard Roe's MOTION for Voluntary withdraw as a party to this case is GRANTED and Richard Roe is withdrawn and DISMISSED as a party to this case.(Mena-Sanchez, L)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
13
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, and
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ex rel.
BRENT BAILEY, EMILY WADE, and
RICHARD ROE,
Plaintiffs,
14
15
16
17
18
No. 2:12-cv-00106-MCE-CKD
ORDER
v.
GATAN, INC., ROPER INDUSTRIES,
INC. and DOES 1 through 100,
inclusive,
Defendants.
19
20
Relator and Plaintiff Richard Roe voluntarily moved for an order dismissing
21
himself as a Relator and Plaintiff in this case. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)
22
provides that voluntary dismissal is permitted “before the opposing party serves either an
23
answer or a motion for summary judgment.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a). Here, no opposing
24
party has filed an answer or a motion for summary judgment, and counsel for Plaintiff
25
Richard Roe has declared that the United States, the State of California, and the two
26
remaining Plaintiffs and Relators consent to the withdrawal and dismissal of Plaintiff and
27
Relator Richard Roe. Withdrawal and dismissal of Plaintiff Richard Roe does not
28
constitute dismissal, withdrawal, or release of claims made on behalf of the real parties
1
1
in interest, the United States, and the State of California, or made on behalf of the two
2
remaining Plaintiffs and Relators.
3
Accordingly, Plaintiff and Relator Richard Roe’s motion to voluntarily withdraw as
4
a party to this case is GRANTED (ECF No. 18) and Richard Roe is withdrawn and
5
dismissed as a party to this case.
6
IT IS SO ORDERED.
7
DATE: May 10, 2013
8
9
10
___________________________________________
MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR., CHIEF JUDGE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?