Bailey et al v. Gatan, Inc. et al
Filing
55
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 7/3/2014 GRANTING IN PART 48 Motion to Compel further production of documents; ORDERING the relators to produce for inspection and copying within fourteen days, the documents submitted for i n camera review; DENYING the remainder of 48 Motion to Compel further production of documents; GRANTING IN PART 48 Motion to Compel further responses to interrogatories; ORDERING relator Wade to provide further responses to nos. 2, 3, 4, 7, 8 , 10 within fourteen days; ORDERING relator Bailey to provide further responses to nos. 2, 3, 4, 10, 11 within fourteen days; DENYING the remainder of 48 Motion to Compel further responses to interrogatories; FINDING that an award of expenses is not warranted. (Michel, G)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ex. rel.
BRENT BAILEY AND EMILY WADE,
13
Plaintiffs/Relators,
14
15
No. 2:12-cv-0106 MCE CKD
ORDER
v.
GATAN, INC, et al.,
16
Defendants.
17
Defendants’ motion to compel came on regularly for hearing. Collen Kennedy appeared
18
19
for plaintiff United States of America with Kelley Hauser appearing telephonically. Larry Raskin
20
appeared for plaintiff State of California. Daniel Bartley appeared for relators.1 Nicolas Kelsey
21
appeared for defendants. Upon review of the documents in support and opposition and in camera
22
review of the submitted documents, upon hearing the arguments of counsel, and good cause
23
appearing therefor, THE COURT FINDS AND ORDERS AS FOLLOWS:
24
1. The motion to compel further production of documents (ECF No. 48) is granted in part.
25
Within fourteen days from the date of this order, relators shall produce for inspection and copying
26
/////
27
28
1
At the hearing, relator’s counsel submitted for in camera review Relators’ Confidential
Disclosure Statement and Agreement Regarding Common Interest and Disclosure of Information.
1
1
the documents submitted for in camera review. The remainder of the motion to compel further
2
production of documents is denied.
3
2. The motion to compel further responses to interrogatories is granted in part:
4
a. Within fourteen days, relator Wade shall provide further responses to nos. 2, 3,
5
4, 7, 8, 10; relator Bailey shall provide further responses to nos. 2, 3, 4, 10, 11. If relators have no
6
personal knowledge of facts responsive to a specific interrogatory, then they should so state in the
7
further response.
8
9
10
b. The remainder of the motion to compel further responses to interrogatories is
denied.
3. The court finds that in the circumstances of this case, an award of expenses is not
11
warranted.
12
Dated: July 3, 2014
_____________________________________
CAROLYN K. DELANEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
13
14
15
16
4 bailey-gatan.oah
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?