Armstrong v. Young et al

Filing 15

FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 06/13/12 recommending that this action be dismissed without prejudice. Referred to Judge Garland E. Burrell. Objections due within 14 days. (Plummer, M)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

BRADY K. ARMSTRONG,

11

Plaintiff,

12

vs.

13

No. 2:12-cv-0123 GEB KJN P

D. YOUNG, et al.,

14
15

Defendants.

FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS
/

16

By an order filed May 1, 2012, this court ordered plaintiff to complete and return

17

to the court, within thirty days, the USM-285 forms necessary to effect service on defendants, or

18

to file an amended complaint. That thirty day period has since passed, and plaintiff has not

19

responded in any way to the court’s order.

20
21
22

IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without
prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).
These findings and recommendations will be submitted to the United States

23

District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within

24

fourteen days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file

25

written objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Findings

26

and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified
1

1

time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153

2

(9th Cir. 1991).

3

DATED: June 13, 2012

4
5

_____________________________________
KENDALL J. NEWMAN
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

6
7

arms0123.fusm

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2