Armstrong v. Young et al

Filing 17

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 6/28/12 ORDERING that 15 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS are VACATED; 16 Motion for Extension of time is GRANTED; Plaintiff is granted 30 days from the date of this order in which to comply with this courts May 1, 2012 order.(Dillon, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BRADY K. ARMSTRONG, 11 Plaintiff, 12 vs. 13 No. 2:12-cv-0123 GEB KJN P D. YOUNG, et al., 14 Defendants. 15 ORDER / 16 On June 13, 2012, the court recommended that this action be dismissed based on 17 plaintiff’s failure to comply with the court’s May 1, 2012 order. On June 25, 2012, plaintiff filed 18 objections, claiming his filing was delayed based on his emergency hospitalization and 19 subsequent inability to attend the law library. Good cause appearing, the findings and 20 recommendations are vacated, and plaintiff is granted an extension of time to comply with the 21 May 1, 2012 order. Plaintiff is cautioned that failure to comply with this order may result in the 22 dismissal of this action. 23 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 24 1. The June 13, 2012 findings and recommendations are vacated; 25 2. Plaintiff’s June 25, 2012 motion for an extension of time (dkt. no. 16) is 26 granted; and 1 1 3. Plaintiff is granted thirty days from the date of this order in which to comply 2 with this court’s May 1, 2012 order. 3 DATED: June 28, 2012 4 5 _____________________________________ KENDALL J. NEWMAN UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 6 7 arms0123.36(2) 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?