Armstrong v. Young et al

Filing 58

ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 10/2/2013 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 49 are ADOPTED in FULL; and plaintiff's 48 request for injunctive relief is DENIED without prejudice. (Reader, L)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

BRADY ARMSTRONG,

12
13
14

No. 12-cv-0123 TLN KJN P

Plaintiff,
v.

ORDER

D. YOUNG, et al.,

15

Defendants.

16
17

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief

18

under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to

19

28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

20

On July 17, 2013, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which

21

were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the

22

findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Neither party has filed

23

objections to the findings and recommendations.

24

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be

25

supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY

26

ORDERED that:

27
28

1. The findings and recommendations filed July 17, 2013 (ECF No. 49), are adopted in
full; and
1

1
2

2. Plaintiff’s July 6, 2013, request for injunctive relief (ECF No. 48) is denied without
prejudice.

3
4

Dated: October 2, 2013

5
6
7
Troy L. Nunley
United States District Judge

8
9
10

arms0123.801

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2