Armstrong v. Young et al
Filing
58
ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 10/2/2013 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 49 are ADOPTED in FULL; and plaintiff's 48 request for injunctive relief is DENIED without prejudice. (Reader, L)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
BRADY ARMSTRONG,
12
13
14
No. 12-cv-0123 TLN KJN P
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER
D. YOUNG, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
17
Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief
18
under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to
19
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
20
On July 17, 2013, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which
21
were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the
22
findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Neither party has filed
23
objections to the findings and recommendations.
24
The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be
25
supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY
26
ORDERED that:
27
28
1. The findings and recommendations filed July 17, 2013 (ECF No. 49), are adopted in
full; and
1
1
2
2. Plaintiff’s July 6, 2013, request for injunctive relief (ECF No. 48) is denied without
prejudice.
3
4
Dated: October 2, 2013
5
6
7
Troy L. Nunley
United States District Judge
8
9
10
arms0123.801
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?