Armstrong v. Young et al

Filing 58

ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 10/2/2013 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 49 are ADOPTED in FULL; and plaintiff's 48 request for injunctive relief is DENIED without prejudice. (Reader, L)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 BRADY ARMSTRONG, 12 13 14 No. 12-cv-0123 TLN KJN P Plaintiff, v. ORDER D. YOUNG, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief 18 under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 19 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 20 On July 17, 2013, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which 21 were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the 22 findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Neither party has filed 23 objections to the findings and recommendations. 24 The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 25 supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY 26 ORDERED that: 27 28 1. The findings and recommendations filed July 17, 2013 (ECF No. 49), are adopted in full; and 1 1 2 2. Plaintiff’s July 6, 2013, request for injunctive relief (ECF No. 48) is denied without prejudice. 3 4 Dated: October 2, 2013 5 6 7 Troy L. Nunley United States District Judge 8 9 10 arms0123.801 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?