Dei Rossi, et al v. Whirlpool Corporation, et al
Filing
188
ORDER GRANTING 180 Motion for Final Approval of Class Action Settlement and Amended Motion for Award of Attorneys' Fees 184 signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 5/23/17. CASE CLOSED. (Kaminski, H)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
KYLE DEI ROSSI and MARK
LINTHICUM, on behalf of themselves and
those similarly situated,
13
14
15
16
17
18
Plaintiffs,
v.
WHIRLPOOL CORPORATION,
Defendant.
No. 2:12-cv-00125-TLN-CKD
ORDER 1) GRANTING MOTION FOR
FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION
SETTLEMENT; (2) GRANTING
UNOPPOSED AMENDED MOTION FOR
AWARD OF CLASS REPRESENTATIVE
SERVICE PAYMENTS, SETTLEMENT
ADMINISTRATION EXPENSES, AND
ATTORNEYS’ FEES, EXPENSES, AND
COSTS; AND (3) ENTERING JUDGMENT
OF DISMISSAL
19
20
On May 18, 2017, the Court conducted a hearing regarding final approval of the
21
settlement and release of claims in this matter, Plaintiffs’ motion for attorneys’ fees and costs,
22
class representative payments, and settlement administration expenses. (See ECF Nos. 180 &
23
184.) The Court having considered the Settlement Agreement and Release (“Agreement”), as
24
well as both motions, and all exhibits and declarations, all papers and proceedings, all oral and
25
written comments regarding the proposed Agreement, and having reviewed the record, and for
26
good cause appearing, GRANTS Plaintiffs’ Motion for Final Approval of Class Action
27
Settlement (ECF No. 180) and GRANTS Plaintiffs’ Amended Motion for Award of Attorneys’
28
Fees, Costs, and Expenses, and Class Representative Service Awards (ECF No. 184), as follows.
1
1
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED THAT:
2
1.
3
meanings set forth therein.
4
5
To the extent defined in the Agreement, the terms in this Order shall have the
2.
The Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of this litigation and over all
parties to this litigation, including the Class Representatives, the Class Members, and Defendant.
6
3.
The Court hereby GRANTS the Plaintiffs’ Motion for Final Approval of the Class
7
Action Settlement, approves the terms of the settlement as outlined in the Agreement as, in all
8
respects, fair, adequate, reasonable, in the best interest of the Class and each Class Member,
9
based on the following factors:
10
a.
11
The estimated loss for each Class Member in relation to the amount offered
in settlement;
12
b.
The risk, expense, complexity, and likely duration of continued litigation;
13
c.
The risk of maintaining class action status;
14
d.
The extent of discovery completed and the stage of the proceedings;
15
e.
The extensive motions practice by the parties;
16
f.
The experience and views of counsel;
17
g.
The lack of opposition or opt outs by Class Members to the proposed
18
settlement; and
19
h.
20
The fact that the settlement was reached after serious, extensive, noncollusive, arm’s-length negotiations by experienced counsel.
21
4.
As the Court previously found in the Court’s Order Granting Preliminary
22
Approval, the Class, for settlement purposes only, satisfies the requirements for a Rule 23
23
settlement class, and is defined as follows:
24
All residents of the State of California who (a) bought a new Class Refrigerator,
(b) acquired a Class Refrigerator as part of the purchase or remodel of a home, or
(c) received as a gift, from a donor meeting the requirements of either
subsection(a) or subsection (b), a new Class Refrigerator not used by the donor or
by anyone else after the donor bought or acquired the Class Refrigerator and
before the donor gave the Class Refrigerator to the California resident.
25
26
27
////
28
////
2
1
5.
The Court finds that distribution of the Notice to Class Members in the manner
2
and form required has been completed in accordance with this Court’s Order Granting
3
Preliminary Approval and the terms of the Agreement, constituted the best notice practicable
4
under the circumstances, provided due and adequate notice of the proceedings and the matters
5
herein, including the proposed settlement, to all persons entitled to such notice, and the Notice
6
fully satisfied the requirements of due process, the Constitution of the United States of America,
7
and Rules 23(d) and (e) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
8
9
6.
No Class Members objected to the Agreement or opted out of it, as of the last
reporting by the Settlement Administrator on March 3, 2017.
10
7.
In compliance with the requirements of 28 U.S.C. § 1715(b), Defendant provided
11
notice of the settlement to (a) the Attorney General of the United States of America and (b) to the
12
appropriate state office in California (as that term is defined in 28 U.S.C. § 1715(a)(2)). As
13
further required under 28 U.S.C. § 1715(d), more than 90 days have elapsed since the service of
14
such notices. Neither the Attorney General of the United States nor any appropriate California
15
state official has served written objection to the settlement or appeared at the Final Approval and
16
Fairness hearing to object to the settlement.
17
8.
Due to adequate notice of the proceedings having been provided to Class
18
Members, and a full opportunity having been offered to participate in the Final Approval and
19
Fairness Hearing, it is hereby determined that they are bound by this Order of Final Approval of
20
Class Action Settlement, including without limitation, the Released Claims.
21
9.
Upon entry of this Order of Final Approval and Judgment of Dismissal, and by
22
operation of this Order of Final Approval and Judgment of Dismissal, the Released Claims, as set
23
forth in the Agreement, of each Class Member against Defendant, are fully, finally and forever
24
released, relinquished and discharged pursuant to the terms of the Agreement, and all Class
25
Members shall be barred and permanently enjoined from participating in any other lawsuit against
26
Defendant, concerning the claims settled and released in this suit.
27
////
28
////
3
1
10.
The plan of distribution set forth in the Agreement providing for distribution of
2
monetary relief to the Class Members is approved as being fair, reasonable and adequate pursuant
3
to Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
4
5
6
11.
The Court hereby awards Class Counsel reasonable attorneys’ fees, expenses, and
costs in the amount of $735,000, to be paid in addition to the monetary relief for Class Members.
12.
The Court hereby awards service payments in the amount of $4,000 each to Class
7
Representatives, Kyle Dei Rossi and Mark Linthicum, to be paid in addition to the monetary
8
relief for Class Members.
9
10
11
12
13
13.
The Court hereby approves the payment of fees and costs to the Settlement
Administrator, to be paid in addition to the monetary relief for Class Members.
14.
The Court hereby directs the parties to effectuate the settlement according to the
terms set forth in the Agreement and this Order.
15.
The Court hereby enters judgment approving the terms of the Agreement and
14
dismissing this suit on the merits with prejudice in accordance with the Agreement. The Second
15
Amended Complaint is dismissed on the merits with prejudice on a class-wide basis. This
16
document shall constitute a final judgment for purposes of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58.
17
18
19
16.
Without further order of this Court, the parties may jointly agree to reasonable
extensions of time to carry out any provisions of the Agreement.
17.
If the settlement does not become final and effective in accordance with the terms
20
set forth in the Agreement, then this Order Granting Final Approval and Judgment of Dismissal
21
and all orders entered in connection herewith shall be rendered null and void and shall be vacated.
22
18.
Without affecting the finality of this Order and Judgment of Dismissal, the Court
23
hereby retains continuing jurisdiction over the settlement fund, the settling parties, the Class
24
Members and distribution of the monetary relief, and any other matters involving the
25
implementation of the terms in the Agreement.
26
Dated: May 23, 2017
27
28
4
Troy L. Nunley
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?