Dei Rossi, et al v. Whirlpool Corporation, et al

Filing 85

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 11/7/13 GRANTING extension of time to answer second amended complaint. Answer due by 11/18/13. (Manzer, C)

1
2
3
4
5
6

Galen D. Bellamy (pro hac vice)
Sean G. Saxon (SBN 230054)
Wheeler Trigg O’Donnell LLP
370 Seventeenth Street, Suite 4500
Denver, Colorado 80202
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
Email:
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

10

Bradley A. Benbrook (SBN 177786)
Benbrook Law Group, PC
400 Capitol Mall, Suite 1610
Sacramento, California 95814
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
Email:
[e-mail]

11

Attorneys for Defendants

7
8
9

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

12

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

13
14
15

KYLE DEI ROSSI and MARK
LINTHICUM, on behalf of themselves and
those similarly situated,
Plaintiffs,

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

CASE NO. 2:12-cv-00125-TLN-CKD
STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR
EXTENSION OF TIME TO ANSWER
SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT

vs.
WHIRLPOOL CORPORATION,
Defendant.
Plaintiffs filed a Second Amended Class Action Complaint (“Complaint”) against Defendant
Whirlpool Corporation (“Whirlpool”) on April 24, 2013. Whirlpool filed its Motion to Dismiss
(“Motion”) on May 21, 2013. Judge Nunley’s Order granting in part and denying in part Whirlpool’s
Motion was filed on October 25, 2013. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(a)(4),
Whirlpool must file a responsive pleading to the Complaint by November 8, 2013.
Whirlpool’s counsel conferred with Plaintiffs’ counsel on November 6, 2013, regarding an
extension of time to file a responsive pleading to the Complaint. Pursuant to Eastern District of
California Local Rule 144(a), Plaintiffs and Defendant hereby stipulate that Whirlpool shall have an
-1STIPULATION & ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME
TO ANSWER 2ND AMENDED COMPLAINT - CASE NO. 2:12-cv-00125-TLN-CKD

1

additional ten (10) days to file a responsive pleading to the Complaint, or until Monday, November

2

18, 2013.

3

Dated: November 6, 2013

Respectfully submitted:

4
5

By: /s/ Sean Saxon
Sean G. Saxon (SBN 230054)
Galen D. Bellamy (pro hac vice)
Wheeler Trigg O’Donnell LLP
370 Seventeenth Street, Suite 4500
Denver, Colorado 80202
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
Email:
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

6
7
8
9
10

Attorney for Defendant

11
12
13

By: /s/ L. Timothy Fisher
L. Timothy Fisher (State Bar No. 191626)
Sarah N. Westcot (State Bar No. 264916)
Bursor & Fisher, P.A.
1990 N. California Blvd., Suite 940
Walnut Creek, CA 94596
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
Email:
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
Attorney for Plaintiffs

14
15
16
17
18
19
20

No further extension of time to file a responsive pleading to the Complaint will be granted.

21
22

IT IS SO ORDERED.

23

Dated: November 7, 2013

24
25

Troy L. Nunley
United States District Judge

26
27
28

-2STIPULATION & ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME
TO ANSWER 2ND AMENDED COMPLAINT - CASE NO. 2:12-cv-00125-TLN-CKD