Shields v. Phelps et al
Filing
9
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 3/19/2012 RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed without prejudice. Referred to Judge Kimberly J. Mueller; Objections due within 21 days. (Yin, K)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
REMON SHIELDS,
11
Plaintiff,
12
13
No. CIV S-12-0126 KJM CKD P
vs.
S.M. PHELPS, et al.,
14
Defendants.
15
FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
/
16
On February 17, 2012, plaintiff was ordered to pay the filing fee for this action
17
within 21 days and was cautioned that failure to do so would result in a recommendation that this
18
action be dismissed. The 21 day period has expired and plaintiff has not paid the filing fee.
19
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice.
20
These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District
21
Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty-
22
one days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written
23
objections with the court. Such a document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate
24
Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections
25
/////
26
/////
1
1
within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v.
2
Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).
3
Dated: March 19, 2012
4
_____________________________________
CAROLYN K. DELANEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
5
6
7
8
9
1
shie0126.fee
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?