Lucero v. Stanton et al
Filing
23
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 1/25/13. Defendants in Case No. 2-12-cv-0146 LKK AC P are directed to file their response to the motion within fourteen days, after which Plaintiff will have fourteen days to file any reply. The motion will be deemed submitted following the expiration of time for plaintiff to file a reply.(Mena-Sanchez, L)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
11
RONALD J. LUCERO,
12
Plaintiff,
13
v.
14
STEPHEN MAYBERG, et al.,
15
No. 2:10-cv-2132 LKK AC P
Defendants.
/
16
RONALD J. LUCERO,
17
Plaintiff,
18
v.
No. 2:12-cv-0146 LKK AC P
19
GARY STANTON, et al.,
20
21
22
Defendants.
/
ORDER
In these related cases, currently set for a settlement conference before the
23 Honorable Gregory G. Hollows on March 27, 2013, plaintiff filed a motion on January 24, 2013
24 for a temporary restraining order/preliminary injunction relief with respect to the defendants in
25 Lucero v. Stanton, No. 2-12-cv-0146 LKK AC P (ECF No. 21). Before considering the motion,
26 the court will provide defendants an opportunity to respond. Therefore, defendants in Case No. 21
1 12-cv-0146 LKK AC P are directed to file their response to the motion within fourteen days, after
2 which plaintiff will have fourteen days to file any reply. The motion will be deemed submitted
3 following the expiration of time for plaintiff to file a reply.
4
IT IS SO ORDERED.
5 DATED: 1/25/13
6
7
ALLISON CLAIRE
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
8
9
AC:009
luce0146.ord2
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?