Lucero v. Stanton et al

Filing 23

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 1/25/13. Defendants in Case No. 2-12-cv-0146 LKK AC P are directed to file their response to the motion within fourteen days, after which Plaintiff will have fourteen days to file any reply. The motion will be deemed submitted following the expiration of time for plaintiff to file a reply.(Mena-Sanchez, L)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 11 RONALD J. LUCERO, 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. 14 STEPHEN MAYBERG, et al., 15 No. 2:10-cv-2132 LKK AC P Defendants. / 16 RONALD J. LUCERO, 17 Plaintiff, 18 v. No. 2:12-cv-0146 LKK AC P 19 GARY STANTON, et al., 20 21 22 Defendants. / ORDER In these related cases, currently set for a settlement conference before the 23 Honorable Gregory G. Hollows on March 27, 2013, plaintiff filed a motion on January 24, 2013 24 for a temporary restraining order/preliminary injunction relief with respect to the defendants in 25 Lucero v. Stanton, No. 2-12-cv-0146 LKK AC P (ECF No. 21). Before considering the motion, 26 the court will provide defendants an opportunity to respond. Therefore, defendants in Case No. 21 1 12-cv-0146 LKK AC P are directed to file their response to the motion within fourteen days, after 2 which plaintiff will have fourteen days to file any reply. The motion will be deemed submitted 3 following the expiration of time for plaintiff to file a reply. 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. 5 DATED: 1/25/13 6 7 ALLISON CLAIRE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 8 9 AC:009 luce0146.ord2 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?