Lucero v. Stanton et al

Filing 32

ORDER ADOPTING 29 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS, in full, signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 4/8/2013. Plaintiff's 21 Motion for Temporary Restraining Order or Preliminary Injunction is DENIED. (Marciel, M)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

RONALD J. LUCERO,

11

Plaintiff,

12
13

No. 2:10-cv-2132 LKK AC P

vs.
STEPHEN MAYBERG, et al.,
Defendants.

14

/

15
16

RONALD J. LUCERO,

17

Plaintiff,

18
19
20
21

No. 2:12-cv-0146 LKK AC P

vs.
GARY STANTON, et al.,
Defendants.

ORDER
/

22

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed these civil rights actions

23

seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate

24

Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

25
26

On February 27, 2013, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations
herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any
1

1

objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff

2

has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

3

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule

4

304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the

5

entire file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and

6

by proper analysis.

7

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

8

1. The findings and recommendations filed February 27, 2013, are adopted in

9
10

full; and
2. Plaintiff’s motion for a temporary restraining order or preliminary injunction

11

in Case No. 2:12-cv-0146 (ECF No. 21) is denied.

12

DATED: April 8, 2013.

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2