Beebe v. Chavez
Filing
5
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Moulds on 4/10/12 ORDERING that this action is reassigned to Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman for all further proceedings; henceforth, the caption on documents filed in this action shall be shown as No. CIV 2:12-cv-155-KJN; and the Clerk of the Court shall make appropriate adjustment in the assignment of civil cases to compensate for this reassignment.(Dillon, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
JUSTIN WAYNE BEEBE,
Petitioner,
ORDER
vs.
12
13
No. 2:12-cv-0155 JFM (HC)
Respondent.
11
F. CHAVEZ,
14
/
15
Examination of this action and the court’s records reveals that the petitioner has
16
17
previously filed a petition for relief in the same matter.1 (No. CIV 2:11-cv-2241-KJN.) Pursuant
18
to Local Rule 190(d), the above-captioned action will be reassigned to the Magistrate Judge who
19
considered the prior petition.
The parties should be aware that reassigning this action under Local Rule 190(d)
20
21
merely has the result that the action is assigned to the Magistrate Judge who considered the prior
22
petition; no consolidation of the actions is effected.
23
/////
24
/////
25
1
26
A court may take judicial notice of court records. See MGIC Indem. Co. v. Weisman,
803 F.2d 500, 505 (9th Cir. 1986); United States v. Wilson, 631 F.2d 118, 119 (9th Cir. 1980).
1
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
2
1. This action is reassigned to Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman for all
3
further proceedings; henceforth, the caption on documents filed in this action shall be shown as
4
No. CIV 2:12-cv-155-KJN; and
5
2. The Clerk of the Court shall make appropriate adjustment in the assignment of
6
civil cases to compensate for this reassignment.
7
DATED: April 10, 2012.
8
9
10
11
/014;beeb0155.190
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?