Vang v. State of California et al
Filing
17
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 01/27/14 DISMISSING CASE pursuant to FRCP 41(a). CASE CLOSED. (Plummer, M)
<![CDATA[
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
NOU VANG,
12
Petitioner,
13
14
No. 2:12-cv-0159 DAD P
v.
ORDER
STATE OF CALIFORNIA,
15
Respondent.
16
Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has requested that this habeas action be
17
18
dismissed. The court will honor petitioner’s request.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is dismissed without prejudice.
19
20
See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a); see also Rule 12, Rules Governing Habeas Corpus Cases Under Section
21
2254.
22
Dated: January 27, 2014
23
24
25
DAD:9
vang0159.159
26
27
28
1
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
