Vang v. State of California et al

Filing 5

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 3/20/2012 ORDERING that this action is DISMISSED without prejudice. CASE CLOSED. (Yin, K)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

NOU VANG,

11
12
13

Petitioner,

No. CIV S-12-0159 DAD P

vs.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al.,

14

Respondents.

15

ORDER
/

16

By an order filed February 2, 2012, the court directed petitioner to file a petition

17

for writ of habeas corpus and submit an application to proceed in forma pauperis within thirty

18

days. The thirty day period has now expired, and petitioner has not responded to the court’s

19

order and has not filed a petition or application to proceed in forma pauperis.

20

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is dismissed without

21

prejudice.1

22

DATED: March 20, 2012.

23
24

DAD:9
vang0159.nopetition(2)

25
1

26

Petitioner previously consented to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction over this action
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). (See Doc. No. 4.)
1