Kalani v. AGM Partnership LP et al

Filing 19

ORDER signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 4/19/2013 DISMISSING this action, with prejudice, pursuant to F.R.Cv.P. Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii); ORDERING that each party bear its own attorneys' fees and costs. CASE CLOSED. (Michel, G)

1
2
3
4
5

Tanya E. Moore, SBN 206683
MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C.
332 North Second Street
San Jose, California 95112
Telephone [phone]
Facsimile [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Robert Kalani

6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

ROBERT KALANI,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14

) No. 2:12-cv-00160-LKK-AC
)
) STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF
) ACTION; ORDER
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

vs.
AGM PARTNESHIP, LP, et al.,

15

Defendants.

16
17
18

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff Robert Kalani and Defendants

19

AGM Partnership, LP and Richard Allen Cherney dba Main Street Café (“Defendants”), by and

20

through their respective counsel, that pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure

21

41(a)(1)(A)(ii), the above-captioned action be dismissed with prejudice in its entirety. Each

22

party is to bear its own attorneys’ fees and costs.

23

Date: April 19, 2013

MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C.

24
25

/s/Tanya E. Moore
Tanya E. Moore
Attorney for Plaintiff Robert Kalani

26
27
28

///

Kalani v. AGM Partnership, LP, et al.
Stipulation for Dismissal of Action; [Proposed] Order

Page 1

1

Date: April 18, 2013

VAUGHAN & ASSOCIATES

2
3

/s/ Cris C. Vaughan
Cris C. Vaughan
Attorneys for Defendants AGM Partnership, LP
and Richard Allen Cherney dba Main Street Café

4
5
6
7

ORDER

8
9
10
11

The parties having so stipulated,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action be dismissed with prejudice in its entirety.

12
13

IT IS SO ORDERED.

14
15

Dated: April 19, 2013.

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

Kalani v. AGM Partnership, LP, et al.
Stipulation for Dismissal of Action; [Proposed] Order

Page 2