Mills v. Virga et al
Filing
16
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 10/3/12 ORDERING that within 14 days, plaintiff shall show cause why this case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. (Dillon, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
JOSHUA DANIEL MILLS,
11
Plaintiff,
12
13
No. 2:12-cv-0166 KJM GGH P
vs.
TIM VIRGA, et al.,
14
Defendants.
15
ORDER
/
16
Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding with retained counsel. He seeks relief
17
pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and has paid the filing fee. This proceeding was referred to this
18
court by Local Rule 302 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1).
19
On June 14, 2012, plaintiff was provided two summonses and ordered to complete
20
service of process within 60 days. That time period has now expired and service has not been
21
effectuated nor has plaintiff otherwise communicated with the court.
22
Within 14 days, plaintiff shall show cause why this case should not be dismissed
23
for failure to prosecute pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).1
24
\\\\\
25
1
26
The 120 day time limit to serve defendant pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m) is also
quickly approaching.
1
1
In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that within 14 days,
2
plaintiff shall show cause why this case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute pursuant
3
to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).
4
DATED: October 3, 2012
5
/s/ Gregory G. Hollows
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
6
7
GGH: AB
mill0166.osc2
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?