Mills v. Virga et al

Filing 16

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 10/3/12 ORDERING that within 14 days, plaintiff shall show cause why this case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. (Dillon, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOSHUA DANIEL MILLS, 11 Plaintiff, 12 13 No. 2:12-cv-0166 KJM GGH P vs. TIM VIRGA, et al., 14 Defendants. 15 ORDER / 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding with retained counsel. He seeks relief 17 pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and has paid the filing fee. This proceeding was referred to this 18 court by Local Rule 302 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). 19 On June 14, 2012, plaintiff was provided two summonses and ordered to complete 20 service of process within 60 days. That time period has now expired and service has not been 21 effectuated nor has plaintiff otherwise communicated with the court. 22 Within 14 days, plaintiff shall show cause why this case should not be dismissed 23 for failure to prosecute pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).1 24 \\\\\ 25 1 26 The 120 day time limit to serve defendant pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m) is also quickly approaching. 1 1 In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that within 14 days, 2 plaintiff shall show cause why this case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute pursuant 3 to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). 4 DATED: October 3, 2012 5 /s/ Gregory G. Hollows UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 6 7 GGH: AB mill0166.osc2 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?