Bigoski-Odom v. Solano County Justice Center et al

Filing 46

ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 3/22/2016 ADOPTING IN FULL 44 Findings and Recommendations; GRANTING 41 Motion for Summary Judgment; ORDERING that this action proceed against Defendant Firman only. (Michel, G.)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

RYAN BIGOSKI-ODOM,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14

v.

No. 2:12-CV-0197-KJM-CMK-P

ORDER

JAMES FIRMAN, et al.,

15

Defendants.

16
17

Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action under 42

18

U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge as provided by

19

Eastern District of California local rules.
On February 3, 2016, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and recommendations,

20
21

which were served on the parties and which contained notice that the parties may file objections

22

within a specified time. No objections to the findings and recommendations have been filed.

23

The court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United

24

States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are

25

reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir.

26

1983). Having reviewed the file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be

27

supported by the record and by the proper analysis.

28

/////
1

1

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

2

1.

The findings and recommendations filed February 3, 2016, are adopted in

2.

Defendant Jeffrey’s unopposed motion for summary judgment (Doc. 41) is

3.

This action proceeds against defendant Firman only.

3

full;

4
5
6
7

granted; and

DATED: March 22, 2016

8
9
10

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2