Chappell v. Fleming et al
Filing
24
ORDER ADOPTING 16 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 12/20/12. Counts Two, Three, Four, Five, Nine and Ten are DISMISSED; Defendants Foulk, Kokkonen, Kingston and Bolls are DISMISSED from this action without prejudice. (Manzer, C)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
REX CHAPPELL,
11
12
13
14
Plaintiff,
vs.
OFFICER FLEMING, et al.,
Defendants.
15
16
No. 2:12-cv-0234 MCE GGH P
ORDER
/
Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action
17
seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate
18
Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
19
On October 16, 2012, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations
20
herein which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections
21
to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff has filed
22
objections to the findings and recommendations.
23
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule
24
304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire
25
file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by
26
proper analysis.
1
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
2
1. The findings and recommendations filed October 16, 2012, are adopted in full;
3
2. For the reasons given in the court’s April 23, 2012 order, Counts Two, Three,
4
Four, Five, Nine, and Ten are dismissed;
5
6
7
3. Defendants F. Foulk; S. Kokkonen; Bryan Kingston; and Bolls are dismissed
from this action without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).
Dated: December 20, 2012
8
________________________________________
MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR., CHIEF JUDGE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
9
10
11
12
/chap0234.804(2)
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?