Chappell v. Fleming et al
Filing
85
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 02/10/15 ordering defendant's request to file documents under seal is granted and the unredacted confidential memoranda dated 05/11/09; 09/28/09 and 02/02/10 shall be filed under seal. Within 7 days of the filing date of this order, the defendants shall either provide plaintiff with the request to filed documents under seal, proposed order, and redacted copies of the 3 confidential memoranda or file a response explaining why providing pla intiff with any or all of these documents is not appropriate. If defendants choose to serve plaintiff with some or all of the documents indicated above, they shall promptly file a notice identifying which documents have been provided to plaintiff. If the documents provided to plaintiff include redacted copies of any of the confidential memoranda, a copy of the redacted document(s) should also be provided to the court in the same manner in which the request to file under seal was submitted. If the defendants believe production of any of the documents is inappropriate and that their response to this order contains sensitive information, their response may be submitted ex parte via email. (Plummer, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
REX CHAPPELL,
12
13
14
15
No. 2:12-cv-00234 MCE AC P
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER
B. FLEMING, et al.,
Defendants.
16
17
On February 5, 2015, the defendants filed a Notice of Request to Seal Documents in
18
which they identified three confidential memoranda that they seek to have sealed. ECF. No. 84-6.
19
In accordance with Local Rule 141, the Request to File Documents Under Seal, proposed order,
20
and the documents to be filed under seal were submitted to the court. Upon review of the request
21
and confidential memoranda, the court finds good cause to grant the defendants’ request to file
22
the unredacted confidential memoranda dated May 11, 2009; September 28, 2009; and February
23
2, 2010, under seal. However, defendants’ notice states that copies of the request, proposed
24
order, and documents were not provided to plaintiff. ECF. No. 84-6 at 2.
25
26
27
28
Local Rule 141(b) states that
[e]xcept in matters in which it is clearly appropriate not to serve the
“Request to Seal Documents,” proposed order, and/or documents
upon the parties, which would include criminal pre-indictment
matters, all Requests, proposed orders, and submitted documents
1
1
shall be served on all parties on or before the day they are submitted
to the Court.
2
3
The rule further dictates that when the request, proposed order, and/or documents covered by the
4
request are not served upon one or more parties, the request “shall set forth the basis for
5
excluding any party from service.” L.R. 141(b). While the request sufficiently explains why
6
plaintiff has not been provided with the unredacted confidential memoranda, it fails to address
7
why he was not provided with copies of the request and proposed order.
8
9
Additionally, while the court finds good cause for not serving plaintiff with unredacted
copies of the three confidential memoranda, there is no indication that defendants have provided
10
plaintiff with redacted copies of the documents. Defendants have offered no explanation as to
11
why measures such as redaction and limited access would be insufficient to address security
12
concerns. The defendants will therefore be given seven days from the date of this order to either
13
serve plaintiff with copies of the request, proposed order, and redacted copies of the three
14
confidential memoranda or explain why providing any or all of these documents is not
15
appropriate.
16
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
17
1. Defendant’s Request to File Documents Under Seal is granted and the unredacted
18
confidential memoranda dated May 11, 2009; September 28, 2009; and February 2, 2010, shall be
19
filed under seal.
20
2. Within seven days of the filing of this order, the defendants shall either provide
21
plaintiff with the Request to File Documents Under Seal, proposed order, and redacted copies of
22
the three confidential memoranda or file a response explaining why providing plaintiff with any
23
or all of these documents is not appropriate. If defendants choose to serve plaintiff with some or
24
all of the documents indicated above, they shall promptly file a notice identifying which
25
documents have been provided to plaintiff. If the documents provided to plaintiff include
26
redacted copies of any of the confidential memoranda, a copy of the redacted document(s) should
27
also be provided to the court in the same manner in which the request to file under seal was
28
2
1
submitted. If the defendants believe production of any of the documents is inappropriate and that
2
their response to this order contains sensitive information, their response may be submitted ex
3
parte via email.
4
DATED: February 10, 2015
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?