Payne v. Cate et al

Filing 38

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 6/8/15 ORDERING that within 30 days of the date of this order, both parties shall file a supplemental brief on the issue of whether this action may proceed as a civil rights action, should be administratively stayed pending further proceedings if any in Nettles, or must be dismissed without prejudice to allow plaintiff to pursue habeas corpus relief.(Dillon, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MYRON A. PAYNE, 12 13 14 15 No. 2:12-cv-0243 DAD P Plaintiff, v. ORDER MATTHEW CATE, et al., Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action. In his complaint, 18 plaintiff challenges his validation by prison officials as a member of the Black Guerilla Family 19 and claims that defendants have violated his right to due process under the Fourteenth 20 Amendment. Plaintiff requests the award of damages, release from the Security Housing Unit 21 (the “SHU”) at his institution of confinement, and expungement of any reference to gang 22 association from his prison file. 23 The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals recently held that a state prisoner properly challenged 24 his gang validation in a habeas corpus action. See Nettles v. Grounds, __ F.3d __, 2015 WL 25 3406160 (9th Cir. May 28, 2015). In Nettles, prison officials validated inmate Santos as a 26 member of the Mexican Mafia, removed him from the general prison population, and confined 27 him in the SHU indefinitely. Id. at *3. Santos unsuccessfully administratively appealed his gang 28 validation and then sought habeas corpus relief in state court to no avail. Id. Santos then filed a 1 1 federal habeas corpus petition challenging his gang validation as a violation of his right to due 2 process. Id. The district court dismissed the petition on the grounds that Santos’s claims 3 concerned his conditions of confinement rather than the fact or duration of his confinement. Id. 4 Reversing, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals explained: 5 The remedy Santos seeks of expungement of the gang validation from his record and release from the SHU to the general prison population, “can fairly be described as a quantum change in the level of custody.” Additionally, success on his claim would result in his immediate release from the SHU to the general population. His claim that he was been subjected to greater restrictions of his liberty without due process of law is therefore properly brought as a petition for a writ of habeas corpus. 6 7 8 9 10 Id. at *10. 11 Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that within thirty days of the date of 12 this order, both parties shall file a supplemental brief on the issue of whether this action may 13 proceed as a civil rights action, should be administratively stayed pending further proceedings – if 14 any – in Nettles, or must be dismissed without prejudice to allow plaintiff to pursue habeas corpus 15 relief. 16 Dated: June 8, 2015 17 18 19 20 DAD:9 payn0243.supp 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?