Roberts v. California Department of Corrections et al

Filing 27

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 2/27/13 ORDERING defendant to respond to 23 Order to Show Cause within 5 business days of the filing date of this order. Defendant's failure to file a response shall result in sanctions. (Meuleman, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 10 PAUL DEAN ROBERTS, Plaintiff, 11 vs. 12 13 No. 2:12-cv-0247 KJM AC P CALIFORNIA DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS, 14 Defendant. ORDER 15 / 16 On December 11, 2012, the court ordered defendant, within 30 days, to respond to 17 18 plaintiff’s October 19, 2012 pleading, in which plaintiff alleged that his file for this case had 19 been removed from his cell. See ECF Nos. 21, 23. On January 2, 2013, the court sua sponte 20 granted defendant an additional 30 days to file its response to the court’s December 11, 2012 21 order to show cause. ECF No. 25. The deadline by which defendant was to respond to the order to show cause has 22 23 now expired, and a review of the court’s docket reflects that defendant has not filed any response 24 or moved for an extension of time to do so. 25 //// 26 //// 1 1 Accordingly, the court orders that defendant respond to the December 11, 2012 2 order to show cause, ECF No. 23, within five (5) business days of the filing date of this order. 3 Defendant’s failure to file a response shall result in sanctions. 4 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: February 27, 2013. 6 7 ALLISON CLAIRE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 8 9 10 AC:rb/robe0247.36 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?