Roberts v. California Department of Corrections et al
Filing
60
ORDER signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 8/4/2015 DENYING 59 Motion to Reopen Case. (Michel, G.)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
PAUL DEAN ROBERTS,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
15
No. 2:12-cv-00247 KJM AC P
v.
ORDER
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF
CORRECTIONS,
Defendant.
16
This prisoner civil rights action was voluntarily dismissed by order filed
17
18
September 25, 2014, pursuant to a stipulation of the parties following a settlement agreement.
19
See ECF No. 57. The settlement agreement also resolved another of plaintiff’s civil rights cases,
20
Case No. 2:11-cv-0474 MCE DAD P. See ECF No. 55. Several months later, plaintiff filed
21
motions to reopen both cases, on the ground that defendant failed to abide by the terms of the
22
parties’ settlement agreement. Specifically, plaintiff contends defendants have failed to pay to
23
him the full amount agreed upon to settle both cases.
By order filed July 9, 2015, after obtaining further briefing by the parties, Chief
24
25
Judge Morrison C. England, Jr., denied plaintiff’s motion to reopen in the separate case. See Case
26
No. 2:11-cv-0474 MCE DAD P, ECF No. 103. For the reasons set forth in that order, plaintiff’s
27
motion to reopen the instant case, ECF No. 59, will also be denied.
28
/////
1
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s May 22, 2015 motion to
2
reopen this action (ECF No. 59) is denied.
3
DATED: August 4, 2015.
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?