Roberts v. California Department of Corrections et al

Filing 60

ORDER signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 8/4/2015 DENYING 59 Motion to Reopen Case. (Michel, G.)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 PAUL DEAN ROBERTS, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 15 No. 2:12-cv-00247 KJM AC P v. ORDER CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Defendant. 16 This prisoner civil rights action was voluntarily dismissed by order filed 17 18 September 25, 2014, pursuant to a stipulation of the parties following a settlement agreement. 19 See ECF No. 57. The settlement agreement also resolved another of plaintiff’s civil rights cases, 20 Case No. 2:11-cv-0474 MCE DAD P. See ECF No. 55. Several months later, plaintiff filed 21 motions to reopen both cases, on the ground that defendant failed to abide by the terms of the 22 parties’ settlement agreement. Specifically, plaintiff contends defendants have failed to pay to 23 him the full amount agreed upon to settle both cases. By order filed July 9, 2015, after obtaining further briefing by the parties, Chief 24 25 Judge Morrison C. England, Jr., denied plaintiff’s motion to reopen in the separate case. See Case 26 No. 2:11-cv-0474 MCE DAD P, ECF No. 103. For the reasons set forth in that order, plaintiff’s 27 motion to reopen the instant case, ECF No. 59, will also be denied. 28 ///// 1 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s May 22, 2015 motion to 2 reopen this action (ECF No. 59) is denied. 3 DATED: August 4, 2015. 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?