Anderson v. Kelso, et al.
Filing
146
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 8/28/2013 ORDERING that plaintiff may depose defendants Lee and Cummings on or before 10/8/2013; these depositions will occur either at or near High Desert State Prison or via video conference. (Yin, K)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
SAMUEL ANDERSON,
12
13
14
15
No. 2: 12-cv-0261 MCE KJN P
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER
J. CLARK KELSO, et al.,
Defendants.
16
17
Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding through counsel, with a civil rights action pursuant
18
to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On August 8, 2013, the court ordered that plaintiff could depose defendants
19
Lee and Cummings within thirty days. On August 15, 2013, plaintiff filed a request for an
20
additional thirty days to depose these defendants. Plaintiff states that an additional thirty days is
21
required in order to locate an expert witness willing to assist counsel in preparing for the
22
depositions pro bono. Plaintiff also states that counsel may be unable to visit plaintiff prior to the
23
depositions due to the prison visiting schedule and counsel’s travel plans.
24
25
26
Good cause appearing, plaintiff’s request for a thirty day extension of time to depose
defendants Lee and Cummings is granted.
On August 19, 2013, defendants filed a response to plaintiff’s August 15, 2013 pleadings.
27
Defendants request that the depositions of defendants Lee and Cummings be taken either at or
28
near High Desert State prison, where they are employed, or via video conference. Good cause
1
1
2
appearing, this request is granted.
Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff may depose defendants
3
Lee and Cummings on or before October 8, 2013; these depositions will occur either at or near
4
High Desert State Prison or via video conference.
5
Dated: August 28, 2013
6
7
8
9
an261.dep
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?