Anderson v. Kelso, et al.

Filing 186

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 1/22/2015 DISREGARDING plaintiff's 185 motion of abandoment; the Clerk shall serve a copy of this order on plaintiff Samuel Anderson at CSP-Lancaster; the Clerk shall serve a copy of plaintiff's "Second Motion of Abandonment" on plaintiff's counsel; and within 30 days, plaintiff's counsel shall file a brief statement with the court that he has been in communication with his client. (Yin, K)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 SANUEL ANDERSON, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. 2:12-cv-0261 MCE KJN P v. ORDER MATTHEW TATE, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding through counsel, with a civil rights action pursuant 17 18 to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action is set for jury trial before the Honorable Morrison C. England 19 on July 6, 2015. On January 5, 2015, plaintiff, himself, filed a pleading titled “Second Motion of 20 21 Abandonment.” (ECF No. 185.) In this pleading, plaintiff alleges that his counsel has 22 “disappeared.” Plaintiff may contact the court through counsel. For this reason, except as 23 directed below, plaintiff’s “motion of abandonment” is disregarded. 24 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 25 1. Plaintiff’s motion of abandonment (ECF No. 185) is disregarded; 26 2. The Clerk of the Court is directed to serve a copy of this order on plaintiff Samuel 27 Anderson, V-84409, California State Prison-Lancaster, P.O. Box 8457, Lancaster, California, 28 93539; 1 1 2 3 3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to serve a copy of plaintiff’s “Second Motion of Abandonment” (ECF No. 185) on plaintiff’s counsel. 4. Within thirty (30) days of this date of this order, plaintiff’s counsel is to file a brief 4 statement with the court that he has been in communication with his client. 5 Dated: January 22, 2015 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 An261.mot 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?