Anderson v. Kelso, et al.

Filing 97

ORDER adopting in full 75 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr., on 1/8/13. Plaintiff's 65 motion regarding retaliation, construed as a motion for injunctive relief, is denied. (Kastilahn, A)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

SAMUEL ANDERSON,

11
12

Plaintiff,

No. 2:12-cv-0261 MCE KJN P

vs.

13

MATTHEW TATE, et al.,

14

Defendants.

15
16

ORDER
/

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action

17

seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate

18

Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

19

On August 6, 2012, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations

20

herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any

21

objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days.

22

Plaintiff filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

23

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule

24

304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire

25

file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by

26

proper analysis.
1

1

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

2

1. The findings and recommendations filed August 6, 2012, are adopted in full;

3

and

4
5
6

2. Plaintiff’s June 27, 2012 motion regarding retaliation (dkt. no. 65), construed as
a motion for injunctive relief, is denied.
Dated: January 8, 2013

7
________________________________________
MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR., CHIEF JUDGE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

8
9
10

/ande0261.805

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2