Hellmann-Blumberg v. University of the Pacific
Filing
77
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 8/16/13 GRANTING IN PART and DENYING IN PART 62 MOTION to COMPEL Subpoena Document of non-retained expert Maria Pallavicini. (Meuleman, A)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
UTHA HELLMANN-BLUMBERG,
12
13
14
15
16
No. 2:12-cv-0286 TLN DAD
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER
UNIVERSITY OF THE PACIFIC, a
California Corporation,
Defendant.
17
18
This matter came before the court August 16, 2013, for hearing on plaintiff’s
19
motion to compel. (Doc. No. 62.) Attorney Jose Fuentes appeared on behalf of plaintiff Utha
20
Hellmann-Blumberg. Attorney Linda Adler appeared telephonically on behalf of defendant
21
University of the Pacific.
22
After considering the arguments of the parties set forth in the joint statement of
23
discovery disagreement filed August 9, 2013, (Doc. No. 64), and at oral argument, for the reasons
24
set forth on the record, plaintiff’s motion to compel is granted in part and denied in part.
25
Accordingly, on or before August 19, 2013, at 4:30 p.m., defendant shall produce
26
communications, documents, records, reports, etc., which Dr. Pallavicini has reviewed in
27
formulating her opinion regarding plaintiff’s record of scholarship as compared to that of tenure
28
candidates in the Chemistry and Biological Sciences departments who were employed during the
1
1
same time period as plaintiff. If Dr. Pallavicini reviews further materials thereafter, defendant
2
shall make a supplemental production of such responsive documents at or before the
3
commencement of her deposition on August 21, 2013.
4
5
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: August 16, 2013
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
DAD:6
Ddad1\orders.civil\hellmann0286.oah.081613
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?