Hellmann-Blumberg v. University of the Pacific

Filing 77

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 8/16/13 GRANTING IN PART and DENYING IN PART 62 MOTION to COMPEL Subpoena Document of non-retained expert Maria Pallavicini. (Meuleman, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 UTHA HELLMANN-BLUMBERG, 12 13 14 15 16 No. 2:12-cv-0286 TLN DAD Plaintiff, v. ORDER UNIVERSITY OF THE PACIFIC, a California Corporation, Defendant. 17 18 This matter came before the court August 16, 2013, for hearing on plaintiff’s 19 motion to compel. (Doc. No. 62.) Attorney Jose Fuentes appeared on behalf of plaintiff Utha 20 Hellmann-Blumberg. Attorney Linda Adler appeared telephonically on behalf of defendant 21 University of the Pacific. 22 After considering the arguments of the parties set forth in the joint statement of 23 discovery disagreement filed August 9, 2013, (Doc. No. 64), and at oral argument, for the reasons 24 set forth on the record, plaintiff’s motion to compel is granted in part and denied in part. 25 Accordingly, on or before August 19, 2013, at 4:30 p.m., defendant shall produce 26 communications, documents, records, reports, etc., which Dr. Pallavicini has reviewed in 27 formulating her opinion regarding plaintiff’s record of scholarship as compared to that of tenure 28 candidates in the Chemistry and Biological Sciences departments who were employed during the 1 1 same time period as plaintiff. If Dr. Pallavicini reviews further materials thereafter, defendant 2 shall make a supplemental production of such responsive documents at or before the 3 commencement of her deposition on August 21, 2013. 4 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: August 16, 2013 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 DAD:6 Ddad1\orders.civil\hellmann0286.oah.081613 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?