Exponent, Inc. v. Exponent Engineering Associates, Inc.
Filing
9
ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 4/17/2012 ORDERING that the Case Management Conference is continued to 8/27/2012, at 1:30 p.m. (Zignago, K.)
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
SACRAMENTO DIVISION
8
9
Exponent, Inc.
10
Case No.: 12-CV-292 LKK
Plaintiff,
ORDER CONTINUING CASE
MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
11
v.
12
Exponent Engineering Associates, Inc.
13
Defendant.
14
15
16
Pursuant to the request of Plaintiff Exponent, Inc., IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Case
17
Management Conference is continued to August 27, 2012, at 1:30 p.m.
18
DATED: April 17, 2012
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-1______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
proposed order.doc
Case No. 12-CV-292 LKK
1
PROOF OF SERVICE
2
I, Kristin Metler, declare:
3
I am employed in the County of Contra Costa, California in the offices of a member of the Bar
4
of this Court, at whose direction this service was made. My business address is 1800 Sutter Street,
5
Suite 460, Concord, California. I am over the age of eighteen years and not a party to this action. On
6
the date given, I served the following document(s):
7
8
In the case entitled: Exponent, Inc. v. Exponent Engineering Associates, Inc., Court, Case No. 12-CV-
9
292 LKK, on all interested parties through their attorneys of record by placing a true and correct copy
10
thereof addressed as shown on the attached service list, as designated below
11
12
13
14
15
16
(SEE ATTACHED SERVICE LIST)
BY FIRST CLASS MAIL (C.C.P. §§1013A, et seq.):
I caused said document(s) to be deposited in the United States Mail in a sealed envelope with
postage fully prepaid at Concord, California, following the ordinary practice at my place of
business of collection and processing of mail on the same day as shown on this declaration.
BY FACSIMILE (C.C.P. §§1012.5, et seq.)
I served such document(s) by fax to the fax number(s) provided by each of the parties in this
litigation at Concord, California. I received a confirmation sheet indicating said fax was
transmitted completely.
17
18
19
OVERNIGHT DELIVERY
I caused such envelope to be delivered to the addresses identified on the attached service list by
means of an overnight delivery service pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure Section
1013
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
BY PERSONAL SERVICE
I delivered such envelope by hand to the offices of the addressee.
Messenger Service: ONE HOUR DELIVERY
BY ELECTRONIC SERVICE (C.C.P. §187):
I caused said document to be served using LexisNexis File & Serve/One Legal File & Serve.
I declare under the penalty of perjury, under the laws of the State of California, that the above is true
and correct.
DATED: April 17, 2012
Kristin Metler
27
28
-2______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
proposed order.doc
Case No. 12-CV-292 LKK
1
Case Name: Exponent, Inc. v. Exponent Engineering Associates, Inc.
Case No.:
Court Case No. 12-CV-292 LKK
2
3
4
Charles Gravett
Law Office of Charles Gravett
1125 Jefferson Street
Napa, CA 94559
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-3______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
proposed order.doc
Case No. 12-CV-292 LKK
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?