Exponent, Inc. v. Exponent Engineering Associates, Inc.

Filing 9

ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 4/17/2012 ORDERING that the Case Management Conference is continued to 8/27/2012, at 1:30 p.m. (Zignago, K.)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 SACRAMENTO DIVISION 8 9 Exponent, Inc. 10 Case No.: 12-CV-292 LKK Plaintiff, ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 11 v. 12 Exponent Engineering Associates, Inc. 13 Defendant. 14 15 16 Pursuant to the request of Plaintiff Exponent, Inc., IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Case 17 Management Conference is continued to August 27, 2012, at 1:30 p.m. 18 DATED: April 17, 2012 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -1______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE proposed order.doc Case No. 12-CV-292 LKK 1 PROOF OF SERVICE 2 I, Kristin Metler, declare: 3 I am employed in the County of Contra Costa, California in the offices of a member of the Bar 4 of this Court, at whose direction this service was made. My business address is 1800 Sutter Street, 5 Suite 460, Concord, California. I am over the age of eighteen years and not a party to this action. On 6 the date given, I served the following document(s): 7 8 In the case entitled: Exponent, Inc. v. Exponent Engineering Associates, Inc., Court, Case No. 12-CV- 9 292 LKK, on all interested parties through their attorneys of record by placing a true and correct copy 10 thereof addressed as shown on the attached service list, as designated below 11 12 13 14 15 16 (SEE ATTACHED SERVICE LIST) BY FIRST CLASS MAIL (C.C.P. §§1013A, et seq.): I caused said document(s) to be deposited in the United States Mail in a sealed envelope with postage fully prepaid at Concord, California, following the ordinary practice at my place of business of collection and processing of mail on the same day as shown on this declaration. BY FACSIMILE (C.C.P. §§1012.5, et seq.) I served such document(s) by fax to the fax number(s) provided by each of the parties in this litigation at Concord, California. I received a confirmation sheet indicating said fax was transmitted completely. 17 18 19 OVERNIGHT DELIVERY I caused such envelope to be delivered to the addresses identified on the attached service list by means of an overnight delivery service pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure Section 1013 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 BY PERSONAL SERVICE I delivered such envelope by hand to the offices of the addressee. Messenger Service: ONE HOUR DELIVERY BY ELECTRONIC SERVICE (C.C.P. §187): I caused said document to be served using LexisNexis File & Serve/One Legal File & Serve. I declare under the penalty of perjury, under the laws of the State of California, that the above is true and correct. DATED: April 17, 2012 Kristin Metler 27 28 -2______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE proposed order.doc Case No. 12-CV-292 LKK 1 Case Name: Exponent, Inc. v. Exponent Engineering Associates, Inc. Case No.: Court Case No. 12-CV-292 LKK 2 3 4 Charles Gravett Law Office of Charles Gravett 1125 Jefferson Street Napa, CA 94559 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -3______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE proposed order.doc Case No. 12-CV-292 LKK

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?