Carmichael v. Sacramento Housing Redevelopment Agency et al

Filing 9

FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 5/14/12 recommending that this action be dismissed without prejudice re 5 Amended Complaint filed by Gina Carmichael. Objections to F&R due w/in 14 days. (Matson, R)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

GINA CARMICHAEL,

11

Plaintiff,

12
13

No. CIV S-12-307 KJM CKD PS

vs.
SACRAMENTO HOUSING
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY,

14
Defendant
15

FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS
/

16

By order filed April 6, 2012, plaintiff’s amended complaint was dismissed and

17

thirty days leave to file a second amended complaint was granted. The thirty day period has now

18

expired, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the court's

19

order.

20
21
22

IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without
prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).
These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District

23

Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen

24

days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written

25

objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge's

26

Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the
1

1

specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951

2

F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

3

Dated: May 14, 2012

4

_____________________________________
CAROLYN K. DELANEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

5
6
7

4
carmichael2.fta

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2