Williams v. Young et al
Filing
24
ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 3/12/14 ADOPTING IN FULL 22 Findings and Recommendations; DENYING 15 Motion to Dismiss. Defendants shall ANSWER the complaint within 21 days from the date of this order. (Meuleman, A)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
CURTIS J. WILLIAMS,
12
13
14
No. 2:12-cv-0318 JAM KJN P
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER
C/O T. YOUNG, et al.,,
15
Defendants.
16
17
Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief
18
under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to
19
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
20
On January 24, 2014, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein
21
which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to
22
the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Neither party has filed
23
objections to the findings and recommendations.
24
The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be
25
supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY
26
ORDERED that:
27
1. The findings and recommendations filed January 24, 2014, are adopted in full;
28
2. Defendants’ motion to dismiss (ECF No. 15) is denied; and
1
1
3. Defendants shall answer the complaint within twenty-one days from the date of this
2
order.
3
DATED: March 12, 2014
4
/s/ John A. Mendez_______________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?