Williams v. Young et al

Filing 45

ORDER ADOPTING 44 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS in full signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 10/15/15 and ORDERING that defendants' 34 Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED. (Benson, A)

1
2
3

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

4

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

5
6

CURTIS J. WILLIAMS,

7
8
9

No. 2:12-cv-0318 JAM KJN P

Plaintiff,
v.

ORDER

C/O T. YOUNG, et al.,

10

Defendants.

11
12

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief

13

under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to

14

28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

15

On July 31, 2015, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which

16

were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the

17

findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Neither party has filed

18

objections to the findings and recommendations.

19

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be

20

supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY

21

ORDERED that:

22

1. The findings and recommendations filed July 31, 2015, are adopted in full; and

23

2. Defendants’ motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 34) is denied.

24

DATED: October 15, 2015

25

/s/ John A. Mendez_______________________

26

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

27
28
1