Diaz v. Siskiyou County Jail

Filing 13

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Moulds on 07/30/12 DISMISSING CASE without prejudice. CASE CLOSED. (Plummer, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CINDY I. DIAZ, 11 12 13 14 Plaintiff, vs. SISKIYOU COUNTY JAIL, Defendant. 15 16 No. 2:12-cv-0328 JFM P ORDER / Plaintiff is a county jail inmate proceeding pro se with a civil rights action 17 pursuant to 42 U.S.C.§ 1983. Plaintiff, the only party to appear in this action, has consented to 18 proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). See Consent 19 filed February 13, 2012. By order filed April 30, 2012, plaintiff’s second amended complaint 20 was dismissed and thirty days leave to file a third amended complaint was granted. The thirty 21 day period expired and plaintiff did not file a third amended complaint or otherwise respond to 22 the court’s order. 23 For that reason, on June 22, 2012, plaintiff was ordered to show cause in writing 24 within twenty days why this action should not be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 25 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). Plaintiff was cautioned that failure to respond to the order to show 26 cause would result in the dismissal of this action without prejudice. The twenty day period has 1 1 expired and plaintiff has not responded to the order to show cause, nor has plaintiff filed a third 2 amended complaint. 3 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is dismissed without 4 prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). 5 DATED: July 30, 2012. 6 7 8 9 10 12 diaz0328.fsc 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?