Diaz v. Siskiyou County Jail
Filing
13
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Moulds on 07/30/12 DISMISSING CASE without prejudice. CASE CLOSED. (Plummer, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
CINDY I. DIAZ,
11
12
13
14
Plaintiff,
vs.
SISKIYOU COUNTY JAIL,
Defendant.
15
16
No. 2:12-cv-0328 JFM P
ORDER
/
Plaintiff is a county jail inmate proceeding pro se with a civil rights action
17
pursuant to 42 U.S.C.§ 1983. Plaintiff, the only party to appear in this action, has consented to
18
proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). See Consent
19
filed February 13, 2012. By order filed April 30, 2012, plaintiff’s second amended complaint
20
was dismissed and thirty days leave to file a third amended complaint was granted. The thirty
21
day period expired and plaintiff did not file a third amended complaint or otherwise respond to
22
the court’s order.
23
For that reason, on June 22, 2012, plaintiff was ordered to show cause in writing
24
within twenty days why this action should not be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule
25
110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). Plaintiff was cautioned that failure to respond to the order to show
26
cause would result in the dismissal of this action without prejudice. The twenty day period has
1
1
expired and plaintiff has not responded to the order to show cause, nor has plaintiff filed a third
2
amended complaint.
3
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is dismissed without
4
prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).
5
DATED: July 30, 2012.
6
7
8
9
10
12
diaz0328.fsc
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?