Berry v. Swingle et al

Filing 53

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 12/7/2012 DENYING plaintiff's 18 motion for injunctive relief. (Yin, K)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SPENCER BERRY, 11 Plaintiff, 12 13 No. 2:12-cv-0363 KJN P vs. DOROTHY SWINGLE, et al., 14 Defendants. 15 ORDER / 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding without counsel, filed this civil rights action 17 seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate 18 Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 19 On August 29, 2012, the undersigned filed findings and recommendations herein 20 which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to 21 the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. Neither party filed 22 objections to the findings and recommendations. 23 In the meantime, the parties consented to proceed before the undersigned for all 24 purposes. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). On November 5, 2012, the district court reassigned this case 25 to the undersigned. 26 //// 1 1 2 For the reasons set forth in the August 29, 2012 findings and recommendations, plaintiff’s motion for injunctive relief is denied. 3 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s motion for injunctive 4 relief (dkt. nos. 18, 36) is denied. 5 DATED: December 7, 2012 6 7 _____________________________________ KENDALL J. NEWMAN UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 8 9 berr0636.801 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?