Norlund et al v. Bogman, Inc. et al

Filing 9

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 5/16/12 ORDERING that the 3 and 5 Motions to Proceed IFP are DENIED as moot. (Manzer, C) Modified on 5/17/2012 (Manzer, C).

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

RICHARD (“RICK”) and SHARON
NORLUND,

11
Plaintiffs,

No. 2:12-cv-00371 GEB KJN PS

12
v.
13
BOGMAN, INC. (“BOGMAN”), et al.,
14
Defendants.
15

ORDER
/

16

Presently before the court are applications to proceed in forma pauperis filed by

17

plaintiffs (Dkt. Nos. 3, 5). However, the court’s docket reflects that on May 15, 2012, plaintiff

18

Sharon Bacon-Norlund paid the $350 filing fee required to commence an action. Accordingly,

19

the court denies plaintiffs’ applications to proceed in forma pauperis as moot.

20

For the foregoing reasons, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

21

1.

22

denied as moot.

23

////

24

////

25

////

26

Plaintiffs’ applications to proceed in forma pauperis (Dkt. Nos. 3, 5) are

////
1

1
2
3
4

2.

The Clerk of Court is directed to issue a summons and related new case

documents in this case.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: May 16, 2012

5
6
7

_____________________________________
KENDALL J. NEWMAN
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2