Robson v. Biter
Filing
15
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 7/3/12 ORDERING that 14 is STRICKEN and the Clerk shall make a notation to that effect on the docket.(Dillon, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
JUSTIN ROBSON,
Petitioner,
11
12
vs.
13
No. 2:12-cv-0384 LKK EFB P
MARTIN BITER,
14
Respondent.
/
15
16
17
18
ORDER
Petitioner is a state prisoner without counsel seeking a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to
28 U.S.C. § 2254.
On June 7, 2012, petitioner’s mother filed a document in regards to her son’s habeas
19
proceeding. See Dckt. No. 14. However, petitioner’s mother, who does not state that she is an
20
attorney, has no authority to represent others in court, even her son. See Johns v. County of San
21
Diego, 114 F.3d 874, 876 (9th Cir.1997); Church of the New Testament v. United States, 783
22
F.2d 771, 773-74 (9th Cir. 1986). While petitioner may submit papers prepared by someone
23
other than himself, he must sign those papers or otherwise acknowledge that he wants them filed
24
on his behalf. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 11(a) (“Every pleading, written motion, and other paper must
25
be signed by at least one attorney of record in the attorney’s name--or by a party personally if the
26
party is unrepresented.”).
1
1
2
3
Here, petitioner has not signed the document filed by his mother. Accordingly, the court
will strike from the docket the above-referenced filings.
Accordingly, it is ORDERED that Docket Number 14 is stricken and the Clerk shall
4
make a notation to that effect on the docket.
5
Dated: July 3, 2012.
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?