Moncrief v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabiliation et al

Filing 114

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 2/23/2017 GRANTING in part plaintiff's 113 motion for an extension of time; plaintiff has an additional 30 days to file a response to defendants' motion for summary judgment. Plaintiff's response shall now be filed on or before 4/10/2017. (Yin, K)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 JOHN PHILIP MONCRIEF, 11 Plaintiff, 12 13 14 No. 2:12-cv-0414 MCE AC P v. ORDER CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 Plaintiff has filed a motion for an unspecified extension of time to file a response to 17 18 defendants’ motion for summary judgment. ECF No. 113. Plaintiff states that he has not 19 received his prescription glasses and is therefore unable to proceed at this time. Id. at 1. He asks 20 that he be given a “short continuance” until he receives his glasses. Id. Plaintiff’s response is 21 currently due by March 9, 2017. Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 22 1. Plaintiff’s motion for an extension of time (ECF No. 113) is granted in part; 23 2. Plaintiff is granted an additional thirty days in which to file a response to defendants’ 24 motion for summary judgment. Plaintiff’s response shall now be filed on or before April 10, 25 2017. 26 DATED: February 23, 2017 27 28

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?