Moncrief v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabiliation et al
Filing
98
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 10/26/16 ordering that plaintiff's request to be present at the 11/02/16 hearing on counsel's motion to withdraw 97 is granted to the extent that plaintiff will appear at the hearing telephonically. (Plummer, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
JOHN PHILIP MONCRIEF,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
15
No. 2:12-cv-0414 MCE AC P
v.
ORDER
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF
CORRECTIONS AND
REHABILITATION, et al.,
16
Defendants.
17
Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §
18
19
1983. Currently before the court is plaintiff’s counsel’s motion to withdraw, which is set for
20
hearing on November 2, 2016, at 10:00 a.m. ECF No. 93. Plaintiff has filed a response to the
21
motion in which he expresses concern over the withdrawal and the fact that he will not be present
22
at the hearing to explain his position. ECF No. 97. The court will construe the letter as a motion
23
to be present at the hearing and it is granted to the extent that an order and writ of habeas corpus
24
ad testificandum was issued on September 6, 2016, requiring the Warden of Richard J. Donovan
25
Correctional Facility to have plaintiff appear at the hearing telephonically.
26
////
27
////
28
////
1
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s request to be present at the
2
November 2, 2016 hearing on counsel’s motion to withdraw (ECF No. 97) is granted to the extent
3
that plaintiff will appear at the hearing telephonically.
4
DATED: October 26, 2016
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?