Reynolds et al v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company

Filing 22

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 11/26/2013 ORDERING that the parties shall have until 1/27/2014 to submit a further joint status statement. (Zignago, K.)

Download PDF
5 SEDGWICK LLP REBECCA A. HULL Bar No. 99802 rebecca.hull@sedgwicklaw.com MARK J. HANCOCK Bar No. 160662 mark.hancock@sedgwicklaw.com 333 Bush Street, 30th Floor San Francisco, CA 94104 Telephone: (415) 781-7900 Facsimile: (415) 781-2635 6 Attorneys for Defendant 1 2 3 4 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 CATHY A. REYNOLDS 2008 REVOCABLE TRUST; R.W. “SKIP” REYNOLDS, TRUSTEE OF CATHY A. REYNOLDS 2008 REVOCABLE TRUST; RHYS HOSKINS, Beneficiary of Cathy A. Reynolds 2008 Revocable Trust and heir of Cathy A. Reynolds, Decedent; MELORIA HOSKINS, Beneficiary of Cathy A. Reynolds 2008 Revocable Trust and heir of Cathy A. Reynolds, Decedent; ESTATE OF CATHY A. REYNOLDS; R. W. “SKIP” REYNOLDS as Executor of the Estate of Cathy A. Reynolds; and R. W. “SKIP” REYNOLDS as Conservator of the Estate of Cathy A. Reynolds, 18 19 20 21 22 Case No. 2:12-cv-00417 JAM-DAD JOINT STATUS STATEMENT AND STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR FURTHER CASE HANDLING Plaintiffs, v. METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendants. 23 24 25 26 27 28 SF/2580223v1 1 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR FURTHER CASE HANDLING 1 2 3 This is a joint status statement submitted by plaintiffs and defendant Metropolitan Life Insurance Company (“MetLife”). The parties had contemplated going to mediation in this case, but realized that certain 4 records needed to be obtained from a third-party insurance agent before the parties could assess 5 whether the case was suitable for mediation. MetLife sought to obtain that third-party 6 information but there were delays in the process. However, MetLife now believes that it will be 7 able to obtain and produce the records to plaintiffs within the next week or two. 8 The parties continue to cooperate with respect to the handling of the case. The parties 9 plan to review the records and then meet and confer as to what the next steps in the case should 10 be in order to move it toward resolution. The parties propose that that they be directed to submit 11 a further joint status statement within approximately 60 days, by January 27, 2014. 12 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between Plaintiffs and 13 Defendant Metropolitan Life Insurance Company by and through their respective attorneys of 14 record, that the parties be given until January 27, 2014, to submit a further joint status report on 15 the handling of the case. 16 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 17 18 DATED: November __, 2013 HELLER & HIBBERT 19 By: /s/ Steven M. Heller (as authorized on Steven M. Heller Attorneys for Plaintiffs 20 21 ) 22 23 24 25 26 DATED: November __, 2013 SEDGWICK LLP By: /s/ Mark J. Hancock Rebecca A. Hull Mark J. Hancock Attorneys for Defendant 27 28 SF/2580223v1 2 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR FURTHER CASE HANDLING ORDER 1 2 Good cause appearing and pursuant to the above joint status statement and stipulation, it 3 is HEREBY ORDERED that the parties shall have until January 27, 2014 to submit a further 4 joint status statement. 5 Date: 11/26/2013 6 7 /s/ John A. Mendez____________ JOHN A. MENDEZ United States District Court Judge 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 SF/2580223v1 1 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR FURTHER CASE HANDLING

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?