Reynolds et al v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
Filing
22
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 11/26/2013 ORDERING that the parties shall have until 1/27/2014 to submit a further joint status statement. (Zignago, K.)
5
SEDGWICK LLP
REBECCA A. HULL Bar No. 99802
rebecca.hull@sedgwicklaw.com
MARK J. HANCOCK Bar No. 160662
mark.hancock@sedgwicklaw.com
333 Bush Street, 30th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94104
Telephone: (415) 781-7900
Facsimile: (415) 781-2635
6
Attorneys for Defendant
1
2
3
4
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
CATHY A. REYNOLDS 2008 REVOCABLE
TRUST; R.W. “SKIP” REYNOLDS,
TRUSTEE OF CATHY A. REYNOLDS 2008
REVOCABLE TRUST; RHYS HOSKINS,
Beneficiary of Cathy A. Reynolds 2008
Revocable Trust and heir of Cathy A. Reynolds,
Decedent; MELORIA HOSKINS, Beneficiary
of Cathy A. Reynolds 2008 Revocable Trust
and heir of Cathy A. Reynolds, Decedent;
ESTATE OF CATHY A. REYNOLDS; R. W.
“SKIP” REYNOLDS as Executor of the Estate
of Cathy A. Reynolds; and R. W. “SKIP”
REYNOLDS as Conservator of the Estate of
Cathy A. Reynolds,
18
19
20
21
22
Case No. 2:12-cv-00417 JAM-DAD
JOINT STATUS STATEMENT AND
STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR
FURTHER CASE HANDLING
Plaintiffs,
v.
METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE
COMPANY,
Defendants.
23
24
25
26
27
28
SF/2580223v1
1
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR FURTHER CASE HANDLING
1
2
3
This is a joint status statement submitted by plaintiffs and defendant Metropolitan Life
Insurance Company (“MetLife”).
The parties had contemplated going to mediation in this case, but realized that certain
4
records needed to be obtained from a third-party insurance agent before the parties could assess
5
whether the case was suitable for mediation. MetLife sought to obtain that third-party
6
information but there were delays in the process. However, MetLife now believes that it will be
7
able to obtain and produce the records to plaintiffs within the next week or two.
8
The parties continue to cooperate with respect to the handling of the case. The parties
9
plan to review the records and then meet and confer as to what the next steps in the case should
10
be in order to move it toward resolution. The parties propose that that they be directed to submit
11
a further joint status statement within approximately 60 days, by January 27, 2014.
12
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between Plaintiffs and
13
Defendant Metropolitan Life Insurance Company by and through their respective attorneys of
14
record, that the parties be given until January 27, 2014, to submit a further joint status report on
15
the handling of the case.
16
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
17
18
DATED: November __, 2013
HELLER & HIBBERT
19
By: /s/ Steven M. Heller (as authorized on
Steven M. Heller
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
20
21
)
22
23
24
25
26
DATED: November __, 2013
SEDGWICK LLP
By: /s/ Mark J. Hancock
Rebecca A. Hull
Mark J. Hancock
Attorneys for Defendant
27
28
SF/2580223v1
2
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR FURTHER CASE HANDLING
ORDER
1
2
Good cause appearing and pursuant to the above joint status statement and stipulation, it
3
is HEREBY ORDERED that the parties shall have until January 27, 2014 to submit a further
4
joint status statement.
5
Date: 11/26/2013
6
7
/s/ John A. Mendez____________
JOHN A. MENDEZ
United States District Court Judge
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
SF/2580223v1
1
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR FURTHER CASE HANDLING
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?