Owens v. Walgreen Co.
Filing
9
ORDER signed by Judge William B. Shubb on 3/27/2012 GRANTING 8 Request to Seal Documents and Substitute Exhibits Nunc Pro Tunc filed by Shaun Owens. (Michel, G)
1
2
3
LAWRANCE A. BOHM, (SBN 208716)
BOHM LAW GROUP
4600 Northgate Boulevard, Suite 210
Sacramento, CA 95834
Telephone: (916) 927-5574
Facsimile: (916) 927-2046
4
5
6
7
8
9
ERIKA M. GASPAR, (SBN 238117)
LAW OFFICE OF ERIKA M. GASPAR
2121 Natomas Crossing Drive, Suite 200-399
Sacramento, CA 95834
Telephone: (916) 749-0278
Facsimile: (916) 647-0535
Attorneys for Plaintiff
SHAUN OWENS
10
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
11
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
12
Case No. 2:12−CV−00419−WBS−JFM
SHAUN OWENS,
13
Plaintiff,
ORDER GRANTING
PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST TO SEAL
DOCUMENTS AND SUBSTITUTE
NEW EXHIBITS NUNC PRO TUNC
14
v.
15
16
WALGREEN CO.; and DOES 1-100, inclusive,
17
Defendant.
18
19
20
The Court, having considered Plaintiff’s Request to Seal Documents, hereby Orders that
21
22
the Exhibits submitted with Declaration of Erika M. Gaspar in support of Plaintiff’s Opposition to
23
Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss, be substituted with redacted versions of the same. Good cause is
24
found pursuant to Local Rule 140 and Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 5.2. Exhibits A and
25
///
26
///
27
28
1
SHAUN OWENS v. WALGREEN CO.
Case No. 2:12−CV−00419−WBS−JFM
Proposed] Order Granting Plaintiff’s Request To Seal
Documents And Substitute New Exhibits Nunc Pro Tunc
Lawrance A. Bohm, Esq.
Erika M. Gaspar, Esq.
1
D are hereby replaced nunc pro tunc, with their redacted versions, which now has the private
2
information obscured.
3
4
It is hereby ORDERED.
5
6
DATED:
March 27, 2012
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
SHAUN OWENS v. WALGREEN CO.
Case No. 2:12−CV−00419−WBS−JFM
Proposed] Order Granting Plaintiff’s Request To Seal
Documents And Substitute New Exhibits Nunc Pro Tunc
Lawrance A. Bohm, Esq.
Erika M. Gaspar, Esq.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?