Owens v. Walgreen Co.

Filing 9

ORDER signed by Judge William B. Shubb on 3/27/2012 GRANTING 8 Request to Seal Documents and Substitute Exhibits Nunc Pro Tunc filed by Shaun Owens. (Michel, G)

Download PDF
1 2 3 LAWRANCE A. BOHM, (SBN 208716) BOHM LAW GROUP 4600 Northgate Boulevard, Suite 210 Sacramento, CA 95834 Telephone: (916) 927-5574 Facsimile: (916) 927-2046 4 5 6 7 8 9 ERIKA M. GASPAR, (SBN 238117) LAW OFFICE OF ERIKA M. GASPAR 2121 Natomas Crossing Drive, Suite 200-399 Sacramento, CA 95834 Telephone: (916) 749-0278 Facsimile: (916) 647-0535 Attorneys for Plaintiff SHAUN OWENS 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 Case No. 2:12−CV−00419−WBS−JFM SHAUN OWENS, 13 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST TO SEAL DOCUMENTS AND SUBSTITUTE NEW EXHIBITS NUNC PRO TUNC 14 v. 15 16 WALGREEN CO.; and DOES 1-100, inclusive, 17 Defendant. 18 19 20 The Court, having considered Plaintiff’s Request to Seal Documents, hereby Orders that 21 22 the Exhibits submitted with Declaration of Erika M. Gaspar in support of Plaintiff’s Opposition to 23 Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss, be substituted with redacted versions of the same. Good cause is 24 found pursuant to Local Rule 140 and Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 5.2. Exhibits A and 25 /// 26 /// 27 28 1 SHAUN OWENS v. WALGREEN CO. Case No. 2:12−CV−00419−WBS−JFM Proposed] Order Granting Plaintiff’s Request To Seal Documents And Substitute New Exhibits Nunc Pro Tunc Lawrance A. Bohm, Esq. Erika M. Gaspar, Esq. 1 D are hereby replaced nunc pro tunc, with their redacted versions, which now has the private 2 information obscured. 3 4 It is hereby ORDERED. 5 6 DATED: March 27, 2012 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 SHAUN OWENS v. WALGREEN CO. Case No. 2:12−CV−00419−WBS−JFM Proposed] Order Granting Plaintiff’s Request To Seal Documents And Substitute New Exhibits Nunc Pro Tunc Lawrance A. Bohm, Esq. Erika M. Gaspar, Esq.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?