Velasquez v. Chase Home Finance LLC et al

Filing 32

ORDER signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 8/9/12 ADOPTING IN FULL 26 Findings and Recommendations; DENYING 25 Motion for Sanctions, construed as a motion for preliminary injunctive relief. (Meuleman, A)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

RODOLFO VELASQUEZ,
Plaintiff,

11
12
13
14

vs.
CHASE HOME FINANCE LLC, et al.,
Defendants.

17

ORDER
/

15
16

No. CIV S-12-0433 LKK CKD PS

Plaintiff filed the above-entitled action. The matter was referred to a United
States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 302(c).

18

On June 29, 2012, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations

19

herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice to the parties that any

20

objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. On July

21

5, 2012, plaintiff filed objections to the findings and recommendations. On July 10, 2012,

22

defendants filed a response to the objections.

23

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 72-

24

304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the

25

entire file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and

26

by proper analysis.
1

1

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

2

1. The findings and recommendations filed June 29, 2012 are adopted in full;

3

2. Plaintiff’s motion for sanctions (dkt. no. 25), construed as a motion for

4

preliminary injunctive relief, is denied.

5

DATED: August 9, 2012.

6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2