Steinocher v. Smith et al

Filing 19

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 02/27/13 that this action is dismissed for failure to prosecute. CASE CLOSED. (Plummer, M)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

DANIEL STEINOCHER,

11

Plaintiff,

12
13

No. 2:12-cv-00467 DAD P

vs.
CHRISTOPHER SMITH, et al.,

14

Defendants.

15

ORDER
/

16

Plaintiff is proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C.

17

§ 1983. Plaintiff has consented to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction in this action pursuant to 28

18

U.S.C. § 636(c). See Doc. No. 4.

19

A recent court order was served on plaintiff’s address of record and returned by

20

the U.S. Postal Service as undeliverable. It therefore appears that plaintiff has failed to comply

21

with Local Rule 183(b), which requires that a party appearing in propria persona inform the court

22

of any address change. More than sixty-three days have passed since the court order was

23

returned by the postal service and plaintiff has failed to notify the Court of a current address.

24

/////

25

/////

26

/////
1

1

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is dismissed without

2

prejudice for failure to prosecute. See Local Rule 183(b).

3

DATED: February 27, 2013.

4
5
6
7

DAD:4
stei467.33a

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2