Steinocher v. Smith et al
Filing
50
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 3/28/16 ORDERING that 49 Motion to modify the scheduling order is GRANTED; Defendants shall file any motion for summary judgment on or before March 31, 2016; and except as stated in this order, the courts June 23, 2015, scheduling order remains in effect.(Dillon, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
DANIEL STEINOCHER,
Case No. 2:12-cv-00467 JAM AC (TEMP) P
12
13
v.
Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’
MOTION TO MODIFY SCHEDULING
ORDER
14
15
CHRISTOPHER SMITH, et al.,
16
Defendants.
17
Defendants have filed a motion to modify the scheduling order in this case to allow them an
18
19
additional ten days to file a motion for summary judgment. Good cause appearing, IT IS
20
HEREBY ORDERED that:
21
1. Defendants’ motion to modify the scheduling order in this case (ECF No. 49) is granted;
22
2. Defendants shall file any motion for summary judgment on or before March 31, 2016;
23
24
and
3. Except as stated in this order, the court’s June 23, 2015, scheduling order remains in
25
effect.
26
DATED: March 28, 2016
27
28
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?