Steinocher v. Smith et al

Filing 50

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 3/28/16 ORDERING that 49 Motion to modify the scheduling order is GRANTED; Defendants shall file any motion for summary judgment on or before March 31, 2016; and except as stated in this order, the courts June 23, 2015, scheduling order remains in effect.(Dillon, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DANIEL STEINOCHER, Case No. 2:12-cv-00467 JAM AC (TEMP) P 12 13 v. Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO MODIFY SCHEDULING ORDER 14 15 CHRISTOPHER SMITH, et al., 16 Defendants. 17 Defendants have filed a motion to modify the scheduling order in this case to allow them an 18 19 additional ten days to file a motion for summary judgment. Good cause appearing, IT IS 20 HEREBY ORDERED that: 21 1. Defendants’ motion to modify the scheduling order in this case (ECF No. 49) is granted; 22 2. Defendants shall file any motion for summary judgment on or before March 31, 2016; 23 24 and 3. Except as stated in this order, the court’s June 23, 2015, scheduling order remains in 25 effect. 26 DATED: March 28, 2016 27 28

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?