Steinocher v. Smith et al

Filing 66

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 8/26/16 GRANTING 64 Motion for Extension of time. Defendants' reply filed August 5, 2016 is deemed timely filed.(Dillon, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DANIEL STEINOCHER, No. 2:12-cv-00467 JAM-DB P 12 13 v. Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR THREE-DAY EXTENSION TO FILE REPLY BRIEF 14 15 CHRISTOPHER SMITH, et al., 16 Defendants. 17 18 Good cause appearing, Defendants’ motion (ECF No. 64) for a three-day extension to file 19 their reply to Plaintiff’s opposition to their motion for summary judgment is GRANTED. 20 Defendants’ reply filed August 5, 2016 is deemed timely filed. 21 22 IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: August 26, 2016 23 /s/ DEBORAH BARNES UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 24 25 26 27 28 DLB:9 DLB1/prisoner-civil rights/stei0467.reply eot 1 Order Granting Defendants’ Motion for Three-Day Extension to File Reply Brief (2:12-cv-00467 JAM-DB)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?