Steinocher v. Smith et al
Filing
66
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 8/26/16 GRANTING 64 Motion for Extension of time. Defendants' reply filed August 5, 2016 is deemed timely filed.(Dillon, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
DANIEL STEINOCHER,
No. 2:12-cv-00467 JAM-DB P
12
13
v.
Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’
MOTION FOR THREE-DAY
EXTENSION TO FILE REPLY BRIEF
14
15
CHRISTOPHER SMITH, et al.,
16
Defendants.
17
18
Good cause appearing, Defendants’ motion (ECF No. 64) for a three-day extension to file
19
their reply to Plaintiff’s opposition to their motion for summary judgment is GRANTED.
20
Defendants’ reply filed August 5, 2016 is deemed timely filed.
21
22
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: August 26, 2016
23
/s/ DEBORAH BARNES
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
24
25
26
27
28
DLB:9
DLB1/prisoner-civil rights/stei0467.reply eot
1
Order Granting Defendants’ Motion for Three-Day Extension to File Reply Brief (2:12-cv-00467 JAM-DB)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?