Barragan v. Washington Mutual Bank, FA et al

Filing 4

ORDER signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 2/28/12. The Court determines that recusal is not necessary.(Mena-Sanchez, L)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
11

GEORGE BARRAGAN, an
individual, on behalf
of themselves and all
others similarly situated,

12

NO. CIV. S-12-0498 LKK/GGH PS
Plaintiffs,

13
v.
14
15
16

WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK,
et al.,

O R D E R

Defendants.
/

17
18

It has come to the court’s attention that the court has opened

19

a minimal account for his daughter with Washington Mutual Bank.

20

Upon review and consideration of the case, the court determines

21

that this interest presents no conflict in the fair adjudication

22

of the case and that recusal is not necessary.

23

IT IS SO ORDERED.

24

DATED:

February 28, 2012.

25
26
1