Francisco et al v. Greenpoint Mortgage Funding, Inc. et al
Filing
31
ORDER signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 12/17/12 ORDERING as follows: Counsel for Plaintiffs is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE in writing why she should not be sanctioned in accordance with Local Rule 110, including a fine of $150 and/or an order dismissing the lawsuit. Counsel for Plaintiffs shall file her written response to this Order To Show Cause within seven (7) calendar days of the issuance of this order. The hearing on the MOTIONS to DISMISS 24 , 21 , 25 , 20 , 23 formerly scheduled for 12/17/12 is CONTINUED to 1/14/2013 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 4 (LKK). Plaintiffs shall file oppositions or Statements of Non-opposition to Defendants' dismissal and strike motions no later than 12/21/12 at 3:00 p.m. Defendants shall file their replies, if any, no later than 1/7/13 at 3:00 p.m. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
13
ARNEL FRANCISCO and JANETH
FRANCISCO, individuals, on
behalf of themselves and
all others similarly
situated,
NO. CIV. S-12-522 LKK/DAD
Plaintiffs,
14
v.
15
16
17
O R D E R
GREENPOINT MORTGAGE
FUNDING, INC., as the
Original Lender, et al.,
18
Defendants.
/
19
20
Several defendants have filed motions to dismiss and a motion
21
to strike in this foreclosure case.
22
be
23
Statements of Non-opposition were due on December 3, 2012, per E.D.
24
Cal. R. (“Local Rule”) 230(c). Plaintiffs, who are now represented
25
by Linda Z. Voss, Esq., did not file any oppositions or Statements
26
of Non-opposition.
heard
on
December
17,
2012.
The motions were scheduled to
Plaintiffs’
oppositions
or
1
Accordingly, the court ORDERS as follows:
2
1.
Counsel for plaintiffs is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE in
3
writing why she should not be sanctioned in accordance with Local
4
Rule 110, including a fine of $150 and/or an order dismissing the
5
lawsuit.
6
to this Order To Show Cause within seven (7) calendar days of the
7
issuance of this order.
8
2.
9
10
11
Counsel for plaintiffs shall file her written response
The hearing on the motions to dismiss (Dkts. No. 20,
21, 23, 24 and 25), formerly scheduled for December 17, 2012, is
CONTINUED to January 14, 2013 at 10:00 a.m.
3.
Plaintiffs shall file oppositions or Statements of
12
Non-opposition to defendants’ dismissal and strike motions no later
13
than December 21, 2012 at 3:00 p.m.
14
replies, if any, no later than January 7, 2013 at 3:00 p.m.
15
IT IS SO ORDERED.
16
DATED: December 17, 2012.
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2
Defendants shall file their
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?