Castaneda v. Amtrak
Filing
14
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 8/7/2012 ORDERING 13 Request to appear telephonically filed by Amtrak is GRANTED; Counsel for Amtrak shall promptly contact the courtroom deputy and provide a "land line" telephone number at which counsel may be contacted at the time of the hearing. (Waggoner, D)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
L. JULIUS M. TURMAN (SBN 226126)
PHILIP J. SMITH (SBN 232462)
MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP
One Market, Spear Street Tower
San Francisco, CA 94105-1126
Tel: 415.442.1000
Fax: 415.442.1001
Email: jturman@morganlewis.com
philip.smith@morganlewis.com
Attorneys for Defendant
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER
CORPORATION aka AMTRAK
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
PILAR CASTENEDA,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
Case No. 12-CV-00524-MCE-KJN PS
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
DEFENDANT NATIONAL RAILROAD
PASSENGER CORPORATION AKA
AMTRAK’S REQUEST FOR
TELEPHONIC APPEARANCE
vs.
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER
CORPORATION aka AMTRAK,
15
Defendant.
16
17
The matter having come before the Court on the request of Defendant National Railroad
18
Passenger Corporation aka Amtrak (“Amtrak” or “Defendant”) to appear at the Status Conference
19
by telephone, by and through its counsel, and having considered the request and good cause
20
appearing, Defendant’s request to appear telephonically is HEREBY GRANTED. Counsel for
21
Amtrak shall promptly contact Courtroom Deputy Matt Caspar at (916) 930-4187 and provide a
22
“land line” telephone number at which counsel may be contacted at the time of the hearing.
23
24
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Date: 8/7/2012
25
_____________________________________
KENDALL J. NEWMAN
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
26
C_Signature-
27
ad4mc0d
28
MORGAN, LEWIS &
BOCKIUS LLP
1
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SAN FRANCISCO
C:\Users\MP071765\Desktop\New Folder\[Proposed]
Amtrak's Request for Telephonic Appearance (8.9.12
hrg).docx
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
REQUEST FOR TELEPHONIC
APPEARANCE
CASE NO. 12-CV-00524-MCD-KJN
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?