Castaneda v. Amtrak
Filing
25
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 7/22/13 ORDERING that Plaintiff's miscellaneous letters 18 , 19 and, 23 are STRIKEN. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
PILAR CASTANEDA,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
No. 2:12-cv-0524-MCE-KJN PS
v.
ORDER
AMTRAK,
15
Defendant.
16
17
Over the past several months, plaintiff, who proceeds without counsel and in forma
18
pauperis, filed numerous letters with the court, outlining communications with defendant’s
19
counsel, describing facts concerning plaintiff’s case, and attaching certain evidentiary exhibits.
20
(See, e.g., ECF Nos. 18, 19, 23.) Because these letters are not filed in conjunction with, or in
21
opposition to, a properly noticed motion or other matter pending before the court, they will be
22
stricken and disregarded.
Although the court is sympathetic to the plight of a pro se litigant who may not be familiar
23
24
with federal court procedure, plaintiff is nonetheless required to familiarize himself with this
25
court’s Local Rules1 and the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiff is cautioned that future
26
unnecessary filings or filings that do not otherwise comply with the Local Rules or the Federal
27
28
1
A copy of the court’s Local Rules can be obtained from the Clerk of Court or on the court’s
website at http://www.caed.uscourts.gov.
1
1
Rules of Civil Procedure may result in the imposition of monetary or other appropriate sanctions.
2
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s miscellaneous letters (ECF Nos.
3
4
18, 19, 23) are STRICKEN.
Dated: July 22, 2013
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?