Korte v. Dollar Tree Stores, Inc.

Filing 22

STIPULATION AND PROTECTIVE AND CLAWBACK ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 9/18/12. (Matson, R)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 MAUREEN E. MCCLAIN, Bar No. 062050 Email: mmcclain@littler.com CONSTANCE E. NORTON, Bar No. 146365 Email: cnorton@littler.com JOHN C. POST, Bar No. 233236 Email: jpost@littler.com LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. 650 California Street 20th Floor San Francisco, CA 94108.2693 Telephone: 415.433.1940 Facsimile: 415.399.8490 Attorneys for Defendant DOLLAR TREE STORES, INC. 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 ROBERT P. BIEGLER, Bar No. Email: bieglerlaw@yahoo.com THE BIEGLER LAW FIRM 725 University Ave Sacramento, CA 95825 Telephone: 916.927.3971 Facsimile: 916.927.7869 Attorney for Plaintiff EUGENE KORTE 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 17 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 18 SACRAMENTO DIVISION 19 20 EUGENE KORTE, 21 Plaintiff, 22 v. 23 DOLLAR TREE STORES, INC., 24 Case No. 2:12−CV−00541−LKK−EFB Defendant. 25 STIPULATION AND PROTECTIVE AND FRE 502(d) & (e) CLAWBACK ORDER Complaint Filed: December 8, 2011 26 27 28 LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. 650 California Street 20th Floor San Francisco, CA 94108.2693 415.433.1940 STIPULATION AND PROTECTIVE ORDER Case No. 2:12−CV−00541−LKK−EFB 1 2 Plaintiff Eugene Korte (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant Dollar Tree Stores, Inc. (“Defendant”), by their respective counsel, hereby stipulate and agree as follows: 3 WHEREAS, the parties to this proceeding anticipate that during the course of the 4 above-captioned litigation, the parties will produce or provide documents and information (including 5 electronic data), which one or more parties contend contain trade secrets or other sensitive, private, 6 confidential or proprietary information; 7 WHEREAS, the parties to this proceeding wish to protect the confidentiality of such 8 documents and information and to ensure that the parties can obtain and pursue discovery with the 9 minimum of delay and expense; 10 WHEREAS, the parties have agreed to stipulate to protect certain privileged and 11 otherwise protected documents, data (including electronically stored information), and other 12 information, including without limitation, metadata (collectively, “document” or “documents”), 13 against claims of waiver and inadvertent production in the event they are produced during the course 14 of this litigation whether pursuant to a Court Order, a parties’ discovery request or informal 15 production. 16 WHEREAS, the parties wish to comply with discovery deadlines and complete 17 discovery as expeditiously as possible, while preserving and without waiving any evidentiary 18 protections or privileges applicable to the information contained in the documents produced, 19 including as against third parties and other Federal and State proceedings, and in addition to their 20 agreement, need the additional protections of a Court Order under FRE 502(d) and (e) to do so. 21 WHEREAS, this Stipulation is designed to foreclose any argument the disclosure of 22 documents subject to a legally recognized claim of privilege, including without limitation the 23 attorney-client privilege, work-product doctrine, or other applicable privilege, by the Producing 24 Party was not inadvertent, that the Producing Party did not take reasonable steps to prevent the 25 disclosure of privileged documents, that the Producing Party did not take reasonable or timely steps 26 to rectify such disclosure and/or acts as a waiver of applicable privileges or protections associated 27 with such documents. 28 THEREFORE, the parties seek the entry of an Order, pursuant to Federal Rule of LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. 650 California Street 20th Floor San Francisco, CA 94108.2693 415.433.1940 STIPULATION AND PROTECTIVE ORDER 2. Case No. 2:12−CV−00541−LKK−EFB 1 Civil Procedure 26(c), governing the disclosure of documents and information therein pertaining to 2 “Confidential Information” or “Counsel Only” information on the terms set forth herein, as well as 3 an Order, pursuant to FRE 502, governing the return of inadvertently produced documents and data 4 and affording them the protections of FRE 502(d) and (e), on the terms set forth herein. 5 IT IS HEREBY AGREED, STIPULATED AND ORDERED THAT: 6 1. In connection with discovery and other proceedings in this action, the parties 7 may designate any document, thing, material, testimony or other information derived therefrom, as 8 “Confidential Information” under the terms of this Stipulated Protective Order (“Order”). Neither 9 party shall designate any discovery material as “Confidential Information” without first making a 10 determination that the information is properly subject to protection under Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(c) and 11 that such protection is warranted in good faith. “Confidential Information” shall not be disclosed 12 except as provided for herein. 13 2. “Confidential Information” includes: 14 (a) Information that any party reasonably believes has not lawfully been made 15 public and which concerns or relates to the personnel information, processes, objectives, strategies, 16 plans, advertising, methodologies, procedures, operations, type of work, products, services, sales, 17 purchases, transfers, identification of customers, customer information, bank and payroll related 18 agreements, policies, marketing plans, vendor information, profit margins, product quantities and 19 costs amount or source of income, costs, profits, losses, financial information, business forecasts, or 20 expenditures of any person, firm, partnership, corporation, or other organization or organizational 21 structure, if the disclosure of such information has the effect of causing harm or potential harm to the 22 competitive position or privacy rights of the person, firm, partnership, corporation, or to the 23 organization from which the information was obtained or of third parties, including but not limited to 24 persons transacting business with any of the parties to this action. 25 (b) The personnel records of current or former employees or applicants of 26 Defendant, Defendant’s parent company and affiliates, or non-parties acquired by or otherwise 27 associated with Defendant; and, 28 LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. 650 California Street 20th Floor San Francisco, CA 94108.2693 415.433.1940 STIPULATION AND PROTECTIVE ORDER 3. Case No. 2:12−CV−00541−LKK−EFB 1 (c) Any sensitive or private personal information, such as social security 2 numbers, driver’s license numbers, home or business addresses, home or business phone numbers 3 for any individual, financial or tax information, and medical information. 4 3. Documents that are confidential under this Order shall be so designated by 5 writing, typing, stamping or otherwise affixing the legend “Confidential Information” (and such 6 other and further legend as may reasonably be included to specify such confidentiality) on copies of 7 the document. Stamping the legend “Confidential Information” on the cover of any multi-page 8 document (or on the cover of a disk containing electronic data) shall designate all pages of the 9 document as confidential, and all data contained on a disk as confidential, unless otherwise indicated 10 by the producing party. Confidential documents (including deposition transcripts) also may be so 11 designated after production by written communication and reproduction with a “Confidential 12 Information” legend for purposes of substitution of the original documentation, and all parties shall 13 use their best efforts to ensure that no prior disclosure shall be used or re-disclosed contrary to the 14 terms of this Order. 15 4. The inadvertent or unintentional disclosure of “Confidential Information” 16 shall not be deemed a waiver in whole or in part of a party’s claim of confidentiality. Any such 17 inadvertently or unintentionally disclosed “Confidential Information” shall be designated as 18 “Confidential Information” as soon as reasonably possible after the producing party becomes aware 19 of the inadvertent or unintentional disclosure and the producing party shall provide counsel for the 20 other parties with a duplicate copy bearing the legend “Confidential Information,” whereupon the 21 unmarked copies will be returned or destroyed. 22 5. Portions of transcripts of depositions, in which any “Confidential 23 Information” is quoted, paraphrased, discussed, or referred to, or in which the subject matter covered 24 by any “Confidential Information” is discussed or referred to, shall be subject to the same 25 confidential treatment as provided herein for the underlying “Confidential Information” and shall be 26 designated as confidential. Requests for such confidential treatment may be made at the deposition 27 or at the latest within twenty (20) calendar days after receipt of a transcript thereof. All transcripts 28 of depositions shall be treated as Confidential for at least that 20-day period. LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. 650 California Street 20th Floor San Francisco, CA 94108.2693 415.433.1940 STIPULATION AND PROTECTIVE ORDER 4. Case No. 2:12−CV−00541−LKK−EFB 1 6. Recognizing the legitimate confidentiality needs of the parties, all discovery 2 shall be used only by the parties to this action for purposes of resolution of the claims asserted in this 3 action, any trial and appeal of this action, and enforcement of any award or judgment thereon. 4 Information designated as “Confidential Information” under this Order, and any summaries, copies 5 (including electronic copies), abstracts, or other documents derived in whole or in part from 6 information, designated as Confidential, shall be used only by the parties to this action; for the 7 purpose of the prosecution, defense, or settlement of the claims asserted in this action, any trial and 8 appeal of this action and the enforcement of any award or judgment based on such claims, and for no 9 other purpose. 10 7. “Confidential Information” produced pursuant to this Order may be disclosed 11 or made available only to counsel for a party (including the paralegal, clerical, and secretarial staff 12 employed by such counsel), to a trier of fact or law in any forum in which the claims asserted in this 13 action may be adjudicated or enforced and the administrators of that forum, and to “Qualified 14 Persons.” A Qualified Person is a person who falls into one of the categories set forth below: 15 16 17 (a) A party, or a current or former officer, director, or employee of a party deemed necessary by counsel to aid in the prosecution, defense or settlement of this action; (b) Experts or consultants (together with their staff) retained by such counsel to 18 assist in the prosecution, defense or settlement of this action provided; however, that prior to 19 disclosure of any “Confidential Information” to an expert or consultant, the party that wishes to 20 make the disclosure shall affirm that the expert or consultant has not previously been retained by the 21 non-disclosing party or a competitor of the non-disclosing party. (A competitor shall be defined as 22 any discount variety retailer.) If the expert or consultant has been so retained, the parties shall meet 23 and confer with each other and, if necessary, submit the issue to the Court prior to the disclosure to 24 the expert or consultant of any “Confidential Information;” 25 (c) Witnesses testifying at deposition or at any hearing in this matter either during 26 their testimony or in preparation therefore; however, if a witness refuses to sign the Nondisclosure 27 Agreement, the parties shall meet and confer with each other and, if necessary, submit the issue to 28 the Court prior to the disclosure to the witness of any “Confidential Information;” LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. 650 California Street 20th Floor San Francisco, CA 94108.2693 415.433.1940 STIPULATION AND PROTECTIVE ORDER 5. Case No. 2:12−CV−00541−LKK−EFB 1 2 (d) or judgment rendered against any party in this proceeding; and 3 4 5 Any person to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary to enforce any award (e) Any other person ordered by the Court or as to whom all parties in writing 8. Any person or entity to whom “Confidential Information” is disclosed agree. 6 pursuant to Subparagraphs 7 (a)-(e), above, shall, prior to receiving such Confidential Information, 7 be provided with a copy of this Order and shall execute a Nondisclosure Agreement in the form set 8 forth in Attachment A hereto, such forms to be maintained by counsel for the party sharing 9 “Confidential Information” and undertaking to have such forms executed. 10 9. On the request of any party, any person who is not a Qualified Person shall be 11 excluded from any deposition during the period in which “Confidential Information” is used, 12 referred to or discussed. 13 10. The parties may further designate certain discovery material, testimony, or 14 other information of an extraordinarily private, highly confidential, or propriety nature as 15 “CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION -- COUNSEL ONLY” (hereinafter “Counsel Only” Material 16 in the manner described above. Such designation shall not be used routinely or to gain advantage in 17 this litigation, but rather shall be used only in exceptional cases where the protections afforded by 18 the “Confidential” classifications are insufficient. “Counsel Only” Material, and the information 19 contained therein, shall be disclosed only to counsel for the parties (including the paralegal, clerical, 20 and secretarial staff employed by such counsel) and to experts who execute Attachment A. 21 “Counsel Only” Material may not be disclosed to opposing counsel’s clients pursuant to Professional 22 Rules of Responsibility, Rule 3-700. If disclosure of “Counsel Only” Material is made pursuant to 23 this paragraph, all other provisions in this Order with respect to confidentiality shall also apply. 24 11. The restrictions set forth in this Order shall not: 25 (a) Apply to any discovery matter which a party can show was lawfully 26 27 28 possessed, obtained, or developed by it other than through discovery in this action; (b) Apply to any information which lawfully is or lawfully becomes public knowledge in a manner that is not in violation of this Order; LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. 650 California Street 20th Floor San Francisco, CA 94108.2693 415.433.1940 STIPULATION AND PROTECTIVE ORDER 6. Case No. 2:12−CV−00541−LKK−EFB 1 2 (c) or reflects “Confidential Information;” 3 4 (d) Prejudice in any way the right of any party or non-party to object on any basis to the production of discovery matter it considers not subject to discovery; 5 6 Operate as an admission by the recipient that any of the information contains (e) Prejudice in any way the right of any party or non-party to seek a determination from the Court as to whether particular information shall be produced; 7 (f) Prevent the parties from entering into a written agreement to alter or waive the 8 provisions or protections provided herein, generally or with respect to any “Confidential 9 Information;” 10 (g) Prejudice in any way the right of any party or non-party to seek such 11 additional or other protection as that party may deem appropriate with regard to the confidentiality 12 of the information; 13 14 (h) privileged or otherwise not subject to discovery; 15 16 Be construed to require any party to produce information that it considers (i) Be deemed a waiver of any objections a party otherwise would have to any discovery request propounded in this action or a waiver of any third party’s claim to right of privacy. 17 12. This Order shall be without prejudice to the right of any party at any time after 18 information is designated “Confidential Information” to file a motion with the Court, upon not less 19 than ten (10) calendar days’ notice to all parties: (i) to challenge the designation of any particular 20 document or information as Confidential or whether its use should be restricted, provided such party 21 has first made a good-faith attempt to resolve such question with the designating party; or (ii) seek a 22 separate protective order as to any particular document or information, including restrictions 23 differing from those as specified herein.1 The Order shall not be deemed to prejudice the parties in 24 any way in any future application for modifications of this Order. 25 26 13. The parties will mark any document that they believe should be filed under seal as “Counsel Only” Material. Defendant’s use of such designations shall only apply to 27 1 28 Any such motion shall also comply with the notice requirements set forth in the Local Rules for the Eastern District of California. LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. 650 California Street 20th Floor San Francisco, CA 94108.2693 415.433.1940 STIPULATION AND PROTECTIVE ORDER 7. Case No. 2:12−CV−00541−LKK−EFB 1 documents containing private, trade secret, business confidential, and proprietary information of the 2 Defendant, the public disclosure of which would be detrimental to Defendant’s competitive interests 3 or the privacy rights of its current and former employees. The designation of a document in a 4 manner that warrants sealing shall be subject to a meet and confer requirement if objected to by the 5 other party. The sealing requirements of Local Rule 141 will apply to any document so designated 6 until and unless a Court orders that the documents are not subject to seal. Should Plaintiff desire to 7 file any document so marked by Defendant (that is “Counsel-Only” Material), Defendant will 8 prepare the “Notice of Request to Seal Documents,” a “Request to Seal Documents,” a proposed 9 order, and all documents covered by the Request that are required by Local Rule 141(b). Plaintiff’s 10 counsel shall provide the document(s) to be so submitted to Defendant’s counsel who will attend to 11 submitting such documents in accordance with the provisions of Local Rule 141. 12 14. The burden of establishing that any information designated as “Confidential 13 Information” or “Counsel Only” Material meets the definitions set forth herein shall be on the party 14 that seeks to uphold the designation. Any information or documents designated as “Confidential 15 Information,” which are subject to sealing motion pursuant to Paragraph 13 shall be treated as 16 “Confidential Information” in accordance with the terms of this Order until such time as the Court 17 rules otherwise. 18 15. All documents produced in this proceeding shall be used by the party to whom 19 such documents are produced solely for purposes of the investigation and/or resolution of the claims 20 arising in this action, any trial and appeal of this action, and the enforcement of any award thereon 21 and for no other purpose. 22 16. Pursuant to FRE 502(d) and (e), the parties agree to and the Court orders 23 protection of privileged and otherwise protected documents and electronically stored information 24 against claims of waiver (including as against third parties and in other federal and state 25 proceedings) in the event they are produced during the course of this litigation, whether pursuant to a 26 Court Order, a party’s discovery request, or informal production, as follows: 27 28 (a) The inadvertent production of documents by a Producing Party subject to a legally recognized claim of privilege, including without limitation the attorney-client privilege, and LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. 650 California Street 20th Floor San Francisco, CA 94108.2693 415.433.1940 STIPULATION AND PROTECTIVE ORDER 8. Case No. 2:12−CV−00541−LKK−EFB 1 work-product doctrine, to a Receiving Party, shall in no way constitute the voluntary disclosure of 2 such document, data or information. 3 (b) The inadvertent production of any document in this action shall not result in 4 the waiver of any privilege, evidentiary protection, or other protection associated with such 5 document as to the Receiving Party, or any third parties, and shall not result in any waiver, including 6 subject matter waiver, of any kind. 7 (c) If, during the course of this litigation, a party determines that any document 8 produced by another party is on its face subject to a legally recognizable privilege or evidentiary 9 protection, the Receiving Party shall: (a) refrain from reading the document any more closely than is 10 necessary to ascertain that it is privileged; (b) immediately notify the Producing Party in writing that 11 it has discovered documents believed to be privileged or protected; (c) specifically identify the 12 documents by Bates number range or hash value range, and, (d) where possible, return, sequester, or 13 destroy all copies of such documents, along with any notes, abstracts or compilations of the content 14 thereof, within five (5) days of discovery by the Receiving Party. Where such documents cannot be 15 destroyed or separated it shall not be reviewed, disclosed, or otherwise used by the Receiving Party. 16 Notwithstanding, the Receiving Party is under no obligation to search or review the Producing 17 Party’s documents to identify potentially privileged or work product protected documents. 18 (d) If the Producing Party intends to assert a claim of privilege or other protection 19 over documents identified by the Receiving Party, the Producing Party will, within five (5) business 20 days of receiving the Receiving Party’s written notification, inform the Receiving Party of such 21 intention in writing and shall provide the Receiving Party with a log for such document, data or 22 information that is consistent with the requirements of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, setting 23 forth the basis for the claim of privilege or other protection, and in the event, if any portion of the 24 document does not contain privileged or protected information, the Producing Party shall also 25 provide to the Receiving Party a redacted copy of the document that omits the information that the 26 Producing Party believes is subject to a claim of privilege or other protection. 27 28 (e) If, during the course of this litigation, a party determines it has produced a document protected from discovery by a legally recognized claim of privilege or other protection, LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. 650 California Street 20th Floor San Francisco, CA 94108.2693 415.433.1940 STIPULATION AND PROTECTIVE ORDER 9. Case No. 2:12−CV−00541−LKK−EFB 1 the Producing Party may notify the Receiving Party of such inadvertent production in writing, and 2 demand the return of such documents. Such notice shall be in writing, however, it may be delivered 3 orally on the record at a deposition, promptly followed up in writing. The Producing Party’s written 4 notice will identify the document, data and/or information inadvertently produced by bates number 5 range or hash value range, the privilege or protection claimed, and the basis for the assertion of the 6 privilege and shall provide the Receiving Party with a log for such document that is consistent with 7 the requirements of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, setting forth the basis for the claim of 8 privilege or other protection, and in the event any portion of the document that does not contain 9 privileged or protected information, the Producing Party shall also provide to the Receiving Party a 10 redacted copy of the document that omits the information that the Producing Party believes is subject 11 to a claim of privilege or other protection. After receiving such written notification, the Receiving 12 Party must, within five (5) business days of receiving the written notification, return, sequester, or 13 destroy the specified document and any copies, along with any notes, abstracts, or compilations of 14 the content thereof. 15 (f) To the extent that an inadvertently produced document has been loaded into a 16 litigation review database, the Producing Party can elect to either (i) have the document returned or 17 destroyed via an extraction of the electronic copies from the database; or (ii) have the document 18 disabled from further use or otherwise rendered inaccessible to the Receiving Party in the litigation 19 review database. If the Producing Party selections option (i), it shall bear the costs of the return or 20 destruction of such electronic copies. 21 (g) To the extent that the information contained in a document subject to a claim 22 of privilege or other protection has already been used in or described in other documents generated 23 or maintained by the Receiving Party, then the Receiving Party will sequester such documents until 24 the claim has been resolved. If the Receiving Party disclosed the specified document before being 25 notified of its inadvertent production, it must take reasonable steps to retrieve it. The Producing 26 Party shall preserve the specified document until the claim is resolved. 27 28 (h) The Receiving Party’s return, sequestering, or destruction of such privileged or protected documents as provided herein will not act as a waiver of the Requesting Party’s right to LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. 650 California Street 20th Floor San Francisco, CA 94108.2693 415.433.1940 STIPULATION AND PROTECTIVE ORDER 10. Case No. 2:12−CV−00541−LKK−EFB 1 move for the production of the returned, sequestered, or destroyed documents on the ground that the 2 documents are not, in fact, subject to a viable claim of privilege or protection. However, the 3 Receiving Party is prohibited and estopped from arguing that the production of the documents in this 4 matter acts as a waiver of an applicable privilege or evidentiary protection, that the disclosure of the 5 documents was not inadvertent, that the Producing Party did not take reasonable steps to prevent the 6 disclosure of the privileged documents or that the producing party failed to take reasonable or timely 7 steps to rectify the error pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(b)(5)(B), or otherwise. 8 (i) Either party may submit the specified documents to the Court under seal for a 9 determination of the claim of privilege or other protection and will provide the Court with the 10 grounds for the asserted privilege or protection.2 The Receiving Party may not use the documents for 11 any purpose absent this Court’s Order. Any party may request expedited treatment of any request 12 for the Courts determination of the claim. 13 (j) Upon a determination by the Court that the specified documents are protected 14 by the applicable privilege or evidentiary protection, and if the specified documents have been 15 sequestered rather than returned or destroyed, the specified documents shall be returned or 16 destroyed. The Court may also order the identification and/or review of documents that have been 17 identified as being potentially subject to a legally recognized claim by search terms or other means. 18 (k) Nothing contained herein is intended to, or shall serve to limit a party’s right 19 and obligation to conduct a review of documents for relevance, responsiveness, or the segregation of 20 privileged and/or protected information. 21 22 17. All “Confidential Information” or “Counsel-Only” information shall be returned to the Producing Party as follows: 23 (a) Within thirty (30) calendar days of the conclusion of the Litigation by 24 settlement, dismissal or entry of judgment, and subject to sub-paragraphs (c) and (d) below, all 25 “Confidential Information” or “Counsel-Only” information, including any and all copies (including 26 electronically-stored copies), abstracts, summaries, physical media by which data was transmitted, 27 2 28 As noted in Paragraph 13, the parties shall only file documents under seal after complying with the procedures set forth in Local Rule 141. LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. 650 California Street 20th Floor San Francisco, CA 94108.2693 415.433.1940 STIPULATION AND PROTECTIVE ORDER 11. Case No. 2:12−CV−00541−LKK−EFB 1 and readable reports or output from the physical media by which data was transmitted, shall be 2 returned to the producing party. Counsel for each party shall additionally certify to counsel for the 3 opposing party, in writing, that any and all such “Confidential Information” or “Counsel-Only” 4 information, including any and all copies (including electronically-stored copies), abstracts, 5 summaries, physical media by which data was transmitted, and readable reports or output from the 6 physical media by which data was transmitted, or produced by the opposing party, has been returned. 7 (b) If “Confidential Information” or “Counsel-Only” information is furnished to 8 outside experts or consultants pursuant to paragraph 7(b), the attorney for the party using such expert 9 or consultant shall have the responsibility of ensuring, within thirty (30) calendar days of the 10 termination of the litigation, that all such “Confidential Information” or “Counsel-Only” information 11 including any and all copies (including electronically-stored copies), abstracts, summaries, physical 12 media by which data was transmitted, and readable reports or output from the physical media by 13 which data was transmitted, is returned to the producing party, and so certifying in writing as 14 provided in sub-part (a) above. 15 (c) Counsel of record for the parties may indefinitely retain one copy of any part 16 of the “Confidential Information” or “Counsel-Only” information produced by others that has 17 become part of the official record of this litigation as well as abstracts or summaries of materials that 18 reference “Confidential Information” or “Counsel-Only” information that contain counsels mental 19 impressions or opinions. Such copy shall remain subject to the terms of this Protective Order and 20 shall not be used by the Receiving Party for any other purpose whatsoever, including but not limited 21 to, other litigation. 22 18. Under this Order, Professional Rule of Conduct 3-700 is inapplicable to the 23 “Confidential Information” produced by the opposing side in discovery; and no copies (electronic or 24 otherwise) of an opposing party’s “Confidential Information” shall be retained as part of any “client 25 file” at the conclusion of this litigation. 26 19. This Order shall survive the final termination of this action and the Court shall 27 retain jurisdiction to enforce, construe, or modify its terms for three (3) years after the final 28 disposition of this action. LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. 650 California Street 20th Floor San Francisco, CA 94108.2693 415.433.1940 STIPULATION AND PROTECTIVE ORDER 12. Case No. 2:12−CV−00541−LKK−EFB 1 2 20. Once executed by all parties, the Stipulation shall be by treated by the Parties as an Order of the Court pending its formal approval by the Court. 3 4 5 6 7 THE FILER OF THE DOCUMENT ATTESTS THAT THE CONTENT OF THIS DOCUMENT IS 8 ACCEPTABLE TO ALL PERSONS REQUIRED TO SIGN THIS DOCUMENT. 9 10 Dated: ____________, 2012 11 signature on original By: 12 MAUREEN E. MCCLAIN CONSTANCE E. NORTON JOHN C. POST LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. Attorneys for Defendant DOLLAR TREE STORES, INC. 13 14 15 16 17 Dated: ___________, 2012 18 signature on original By: 19 ROBERT P. BIEGLER THE BIEGLER LAW FIRM Attorney for Plaintiff EUGENE KORTE 20 21 22 SO ORDERED. 23 24 DATED: September 18, 2012. 25 26 27 28 LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. 650 California Street 20th Floor San Francisco, CA 94108.2693 415.433.1940 STIPULATION AND PROTECTIVE ORDER 13. Case No. 2:12−CV−00541−LKK−EFB 1 ATTACHMENT A 2 As a condition to inspecting or otherwise using documents and information produced 3 in the above-captioned action, I certify that I have read the attached Stipulation and Protective and 4 FRE 502(d) & (e) Clawback Order (the “Stipulation and Order”) regarding the handling of 5 documents and information designated as “Confidential” or “Confidential Information -- Counsel 6 Only” and hereby agree to make no use of such documents and/or information except as permitted 7 by the express terms of the Stipulation and Order, to make no disclosure of such documents and/or 8 information to persons other than those who may have access to it under such Stipulation and Order, 9 to return all originals and all copies of such documents and/or information when required to do so 10 under the Stipulation and Order, and otherwise to be bound by all of the terms and provisions of the 11 Stipulation and Order. 12 13 Dated: ______________________ Signed:_________________________________ 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 Firmwide:110732443.1 061603.1055 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. 650 California Street 20th Floor San Francisco, CA 94108.2693 415.433.1940 STIPULATION AND PROTECTIVE ORDER 14. Case No. 2:12−CV−00541−LKK−EFB

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?