Korte v. Dollar Tree Stores, Inc.
Filing
58
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 9/11/2013 ORDERING that copies of each trial exhibit be exchanged by 10/14/2013; ORDERING that any objections to said exhibits be submitted by 10/28/2013. (Michel, G)
1
2
3
4
5
6
MAUREEN E. MCCLAIN, Bar No. 062050
Email: mmcclain@littler.com
CONSTANCE E. NORTON, Bar No. 146365
Email: cnorton@littler.com
LISA K. HORGAN, Bar No. 267632
Email: lhorgan@littler.com
LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.
650 California Street
20th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94108.2693
Telephone:
415.433.1940
Facsimile:
415.399.8490
7
8
Attorneys for Defendant
DOLLAR TREE STORES, INC. (ERRONEOUSLY
SUED AS DOLLAR TREE CORP)
9
10
11
12
ROBERT P. BIEGLER, Bar No. 88506
Email: bieglerlaw@yahoo.com
THE BIEGLER LAW FIRM
725 University Avenue
Sacramento, CA 95825
Telephone:
916.927.3971
Facsimile:
916.927.7869
13
14
Attorneys for Plaintiff
EUGENE KORTE
15
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
16
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
17
SACRAMENTO DIVISION
18
19
EUGENE KORTE,
20
Plaintiff,
21
v.
22
Case No. 2:12-cv-00541 LKK AC
STIPULATION AND ORDER
CONTINUING PRETRIAL EXHIBIT
EXCHANGE AND RELATED
OBJECTIONS DEADLINES
DOLLAR TREE CORP,
23
Defendants.
24
COMPLAINT FILED:
FIRST AMENDED
COMPLAINT FILED:
TRIAL DATE:
December 8, 2011
June 20, 2012
January 14, 2014
25
26
27
28
LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.
650 California Street
20th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94108.2693
415.433.1940
STIP AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE
EXHIBIT EXCHANGE AND OBJECTIONS
CASE NO. 2:12-cv-00541 LKK AC
1
The parties to this action, Dollar Tree Stores, Inc. (erroneously sued as Dollar Tree
2
Corp) (“Dollar Tree”) and Plaintiff Eugene Korte (“Plaintiff”)(collectively the “Parties”), by their
3
respective counsel, hereby stipulate and agree as follows:
4
WHEREAS, as set forth in the Court’s Pretrial Conference Order (Tentative) (ECF
5
No. 56), the Court has ordered the Parties to brief the issue of whether the Court continues to have
6
jurisdiction over this matter pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332;
7
8
WHEREAS, Dollar Tree’s brief is due to the Court on September 13, 2013 and
Plaintiff’s reply brief is due by September 20, 2013;
9
WHEREAS, the Court’s Pretrial Conference Order (Tentative) requires the Parties to
10
exchange copies of each trial exhibit by September 13, 2013 and submit any objections to said
11
exhibits by September 27, 2013 (the “Exhibit Exchange and Objection Deadlines”);
12
WHEREAS, the Parties agree that a brief extension on the Exhibit Exchange and
13
Objection Deadlines to October 14, 2013 and October 28, 2013 respectively to allow the Court time
14
to rule on the jurisdictional issue is in the interests of judicial economy and efficiency.
15
IT IS NOW HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED that:
16
The deadline to exchanges copies of each trial exhibit shall be extended from
17
September 13, 2013 to October 14, 2013, and the deadline to submit any objections to said exhibits
18
shall be extended from September 27, 2013 to October 28, 2013.
19
THE FILER OF THE DOCUMENT ATTESTS THAT THE CONTENT OF
20
THIS DOCUMENT IS ACCEPTABLE TO ALL PERSONS REQUIRED TO SIGN THIS
21
DOCUMENT.
22
Dated: September 10, 2013
By:/s/ Robert P. Biegler (as authorized on 9/10/13)
ROBERT P. BIEGLER
THE BIEGLER LAW FIRM
Attorneys for Plaintiff
EUGENE KORTE
By:/s/ Constance E. Norton
CONSTANCE E. NORTON
LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.
Attorneys for Defendant
DOLLAR TREE STORES, INC.
(ERRONEOUSLY SUED AS DOLLAR
TREE CORP)
23
24
25
Dated: September 10, 2013
26
27
28
LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.
650 California Street
20th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94108.2693
415.433.1940
STIP AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE
EXHIBIT EXCHANGE AND OBJECTIONS
1.
CASE NO. 2:12-cv-00541 LKK AC
1
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED:
2
3
Dated: September 11, 2013.
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.
650 California Street
20th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94108.2693
415.433.1940
STIP AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE
EXHIBIT EXCHANGE AND OBJECTIONS
2.
CASE NO. 2:12-cv-00541 LKK AC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?