Sirrium v. Bank of America NA et al

Filing 23

ORDER denying 22 Motion to amend signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 12/17/12. (Matson, R)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

SIRRIUM,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14

No. 2:12-CV-0543-LKK-CMK

vs.

ORDER

BANK OF AMERICA NA, et al.,

15

Defendants.

16

/

17

Plaintiff, who is proceeding pro se, brings this civil action. Pending before the

18

court is plaintiff’s motion for leave to further amend the complaint (Doc. 22). The motion will

19

be denied for two reasons. First, plaintiff did not submit a proposed amended complaint.

20

Plaintiff’s failure to do so makes it impossible for the court to evaluate whether leave to amend

21

should be granted. Second, plaintiff’s motion was not properly noticed for hearing before the

22

undersigned pursuant to Eastern District of California Local Rule 302(c)(21).

23

///

24

///

25

///

26

///
1

1
2

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s motion for leave to
amend (Doc. 22) is denied without prejudice.

3
4
5
6

DATED: December 17, 2012
______________________________________
CRAIG M. KELLISON
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2