Morales v. Hedgpeth

Filing 27

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 5/23/13 ORDERING that respondents motion to dismiss is deemed submitted for decision.(Dillon, M)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

OSCAR MORALES,

11
12
13

Petitioner,

No. 2: 12-cv-0544 LKK KJN P

vs.
ANTHONY HEDGPETH, et al.,

14

Respondents.

15

ORDER
/

16

On April 17, 2013, the undersigned granted respondents’ motion for an extension

17

of time to May 12, 2013 to file a reply to petitioner’s opposition. The grounds of this request

18

were that petitioner argued in his opposition that he was entitled to equitable tolling.

19

Respondents claimed that they had just received documents necessary to respond to this

20

argument and required additional time to review these documents and prepare a reply.

21

Respondents did not file a reply to petitioner’s opposition. Accordingly, IT IS

22

HEREBY ORDERED that respondents’ motion to dismiss is deemed submitted for decision.

23

DATED: May 23, 2013

24

_____________________________________
KENDALL J. NEWMAN
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

25
26

mor544.res

1